A comparison of clindamycin phosphate 1 percent topical lotion and placebo in the treatment of acne vulgaris
- PMID: 2945704
A comparison of clindamycin phosphate 1 percent topical lotion and placebo in the treatment of acne vulgaris
Abstract
The efficacy and skin tolerance of 1 percent clindamycin phosphate lotion were compared with those of the placebo for the lotion in a randomized, double-blind, 12-week study in forty-six patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Patients using the 1 percent clindamycin lotion experienced reductions in numbers of pustules, papules, open comedones, and nodulocystic lesions. Papule counts were also reduced in placebo-treated patients. The group using clindamycin lotion had significantly greater reductions in pustule counts at week 12 and papule counts at week 3 than the placebo-treated group. Nearly 90 percent of the evaluable patients at week 12 experienced improvement or marked improvement in their acne according to the physician's evaluation, regardless of treatment group. Both regimens were well tolerated. Although diarrhea was reported by eight patients (three taking clindamycin, five receiving placebo), no patients discontinued the protocol because of diarrhea. This study demonstrated the efficacy of 1 percent clindamycin topical lotion in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.
Similar articles
-
Clindamycin lotion alone versus combination lotion of clindamycin phosphate plus tretinoin versus combination lotion of clindamycin phosphate plus salicylic acid in the topical treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris: a randomized control trial.Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009 May-Jun;75(3):279-82. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.51247. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009. PMID: 19439881 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of Cleocin T 1 percent solution and Cleocin T 1 percent lotion in the treatment of acne vulgaris.Cutis. 1985 Sep;36(3):265-8. Cutis. 1985. PMID: 2932307 Clinical Trial.
-
Topical clindamycin therapy for acne vulgaris. A cooperative clinical study.Arch Dermatol. 1981 Aug;117(8):482-5. Arch Dermatol. 1981. PMID: 6455095 Clinical Trial.
-
The BEST study: evaluating efficacy by selected demographic subsets.Cutis. 2003 Feb;71(2 Suppl):18-26. Cutis. 2003. PMID: 12630671 Review.
-
When do efficacy outcomes in clinical trials correlate with clinical relevance? analysis of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3.75% gel in moderate to severe acne vulgaris.Cutis. 2016 Jul;98(1):21-5. Cutis. 2016. PMID: 27529706 Review.
Cited by
-
Acneiform facial eruptions: a problem for young women.Can Fam Physician. 2005 Apr;51(4):527-33. Can Fam Physician. 2005. PMID: 15856972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acne vulgaris.BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 May 15;2008:1714. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008. PMID: 19450306 Free PMC article.
-
Acne vulgaris.BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jan 5;2011:1714. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011. PMID: 21477388 Free PMC article.
-
A review of diagnosis and treatment of acne in adult female patients.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Dec 23;4(2):56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.10.006. eCollection 2018 Jun. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 29872679 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical