Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;43(16):E959-E967.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002606.

Influence of the Initial Sagittal Lumbar Alignment on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Single-Level Lumbar Total Disc Replacements at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Affiliations

Influence of the Initial Sagittal Lumbar Alignment on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Single-Level Lumbar Total Disc Replacements at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Aymeric Faure et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE.: To analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing a one-level lumbar total disc replacement (TDR), according to the initial sagittal alignment of the spine.

Summary of background data: No authors have highlighted correlation between the initial spinopelvic parameters and the postoperative outcome after a one-level TDR.

Methods: Seventy-eight patients were included: 14 TDR at L4-L5 and 64 TDR at L5-S1 level. Clinical assessment was performed on leg pain and axial back pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Radiographic assessment included full spine standing anteroposterior and lateral films. Data were compared according to the initial lumbar sagittal alignment described by Roussouly.

Results: Forty-five female patients and 33 male patients with a mean age of 41.7 years (95% confidence interval [40.3-43.1]) were included. The mean follow-up was 46.4 months (95% [40.6-51.6]). Two patients were considered as Roussouly type 1 (2.6%), 36 patients as type 2 (46.2%), 33 patients as type 3 (42.3%), and 7 patients as type 4 (9%). Preoperatively, there were no clinical differences depending on Roussouly's type of back. Pelvic incidence (P < 0.001), sacral slope (P < 0.001), lumbar lordosis (P < 0.001), and spinosacral angle (P < 0.001) were different between the Roussouly's types of back. Postoperative clinical outcome improved (P < 0.001) but did not vary according to the Roussouly types except for leg pain VAS (P = 0.03). Post hoc tests did not reveal difference between the Roussouly's types and leg pain VAS. Postoperative radiographic outcomes did not change excepted for the lumbar lordosis (P < 0.001), thoracic kyphosis (P = 0.007), and spinosacral angle (P = 0.02). The Roussouly type had no effect on the postoperative course of radiographic parameters.

Conclusion: Equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes have been highlighted independently of the increasing of the sacral slope for patients with one-level lumbar TDR.

Level of evidence: 3.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, et al. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:1441–1445.
    1. Allain J, Delecrin J, Beaurain J, et al. Stand-alone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases. Eur Spine J 2014; 23:2136–2143.
    1. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002; 11 (suppl 2):S131–S136.
    1. Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, et al. The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 2005; 14:480–486.
    1. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 1997; 337:64–76.

LinkOut - more resources