Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;37(6):438-443.
doi: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1440605. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients: indications and complications

Affiliations

Porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients: indications and complications

Paul Lang et al. Orbit. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

This study aims to identify risk factors associated with complications in retinoblastoma patients following primary and secondary enucleations with porous implant placement. A retrospective case-control study was performed between 2010 and 2015. Data pertaining to subjects' demographics, medical history, clinical, and pathological findings, implant characteristics and complications were collected. The analysis included 103 eyes of 101 patients age 27.8 ± 21.9 months undergoing enucleation for retinoblastoma. Postoperatively, 19/103 (18%) eyes developed exposure, extrusion, or hematoma requiring subsequent surgery. Exposure was the most common postoperative complication (12/19, 63%). Age at enucleation 24 months or younger, Hispanic ethnicity, female gender, and intravenous chemotherapy prior to enucleation were associated with increased odds of implant complications. In contrast, patients who were given intravitreal melphalan (IM), subtenons carboplatin (SC), or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) did not demonstrate an increased risk of complications. In this cohort of retinoblastoma patients undergoing primary or secondary enucleation with porous implants, implant exposure was the most common postoperative complication. Our findings suggest that female gender, Hispanic ethnicity, age at enucleation 24 months or younger, and intravenous chemotherapy prior to enucleation may increase the risk of complications.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; complications; exposure; porous implant; retinoblastoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No conflicting relationship exists for any author.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Photographs depicting two instances of orbital implant exposure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang J-K, Liao SL, Lin LLK, Kao SCS, Tseng H-S. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(1):109–116. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.03.04210.1016/j.ajo.2007.03.042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Custer PL, Kennedy RH, Woog JJ, Kaltreider SA, Meyer DR. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(10):2054–2061. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00857-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee V, Subak-Sharpe I, Hungerford JL, Davies NP, Logani S. Exposure of primary orbital implants in postenucleation retinoblastoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2000;107 (5):940002D945; discussion 946. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00016-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baino F, Perero S, Ferraris S, et al. Biomaterials for orbital implants and ocular prostheses: overview and future prospects. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(3):1064–1087. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.01410.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trichopoulos N, Augsburger JJ. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21 (5):331–336. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000175034.88019.a510.1097/01.iop.0000175034.88019.a5 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources