Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial
- PMID: 29462005
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002705
Oncological Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 2/3 Trial
Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to determine whether neoadjuvant treatment increases survival in patients with BRPC.
Summary background data: Despite many promising retrospective data on the effect of neoadjuvant treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), no high-level evidence exists to support the role of such treatment.
Methods: This phase 2/3 multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to enroll 110 patients with BRPC who were randomly assigned to gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (54 Gray external beam radiation) followed by surgery or upfront surgery followed by chemoradiation treatment from four large-volume centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was the 2-year survival rate (2-YSR). Interim analysis was planned at the time of 50% case enrollment.
Results: After excluding the patients who withdrew consent (n = 8) from the 58 enrolled patients, 27 patients were allocated to neoadjuvant treatment and 23 to upfront surgery groups. The overall 2-YSR was 34.0% with a median survival of 16 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 2-YSR and median survival were significantly better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation than the upfront surgery group [40.7%, 21 months vs 26.1%, 12 months, hazard ratio 1.495 (95% confidence interval 0.66-3.36), P = 0.028]. R0 resection rate was also significantly higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group than upfront surgery (n = 14, 51.8% vs n = 6, 26.1%, P = 0.004). The safety monitoring committee decided on early termination of the study on the basis of the statistical significance of neoadjuvant treatment efficacy.
Conclusion: This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial on the oncological benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in BRPC. Compared to upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiation provides oncological benefits in patients with BRPC.
Comment in
- 
  
  Preoperative Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The New Standard?Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):223-224. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002783. Ann Surg. 2018. PMID: 29672417 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
- 
  
  Adjuvante versus neoadjuvante Therapie beim Borderline-resektablen Pankreaskarzinom.Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Oct;143(5):457. doi: 10.1055/a-0727-7234. Epub 2018 Oct 24. Zentralbl Chir. 2018. PMID: 30357784 German. No abstract available.
- 
  
  Comment on "Interpreting Clinical Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Gemcitabine Versus Upfront Surgery in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (BRPC)".Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):e48-e50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003115. Ann Surg. 2019. PMID: 30499804 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
- 
  
  Gastrointestinal Cancers: Management of Rectal, Hepatocellular, Pancreatic, and Esophageal Cancers.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 May 1;104(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.052. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019. PMID: 30967220 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Other Literature Sources
- Medical
 
        