Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;21(2):84-94.
doi: 10.1177/1098612X18758176. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

Development, initial validation and reliability testing of a web-based, generic feline health-related quality-of-life instrument

Affiliations

Development, initial validation and reliability testing of a web-based, generic feline health-related quality-of-life instrument

Cory E Noble et al. J Feline Med Surg. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a valid, reliable, web-based generic feline health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaire instrument to measure the affective impact of chronic disease.

Methods: A large initial item pool, obtained through interviews with cat owners, was reduced using predetermined criteria, survey scores for relevance and clarity, and the ability of individual items to discriminate between healthy and sick cats when owners completed a prototype questionnaire. Using these data, factor analysis was used to derive a scoring algorithm and provide evidence for factorial validity. Validity was demonstrated further in a field trial using a 'known groups' approach (sick vs healthy cats will have a different HRQoL profile, and the HRQoL profile of cats will deteriorate as comorbidities increase). Test-retest reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: In total, 165 items were reduced to 20 and, on the basis of a factor analysis that explained 72.3% of the variation in scores input by 71 owners of 30 healthy and 41 sick cats using the prototype, these were allocated to three domains (vitality, comfort and emotional wellbeing [EWB]) with a scoring algorithm derived using item loadings. Subsequently, the owners of 36 healthy and 58 sick cats completed one or two (n = 48) assessments. Median scores (healthy vs sick) for all domains were significantly different ( P <0.001), 78% of cats were correctly classified as healthy or sick and for comorbidities the correlation coefficients were moderate (vitality 0.64; comfort 0.63; EWB 0.50). Test-retest reliability was good (ICC vitality 0.635; comfort 0.716; EWB 0.853).

Conclusions and relevance: This study provides initial evidence for the validity and reliability of a novel HRQoL instrument to aid the assessment and management of chronic diseases of cats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Professor Reid is a shareholder of NewMetrica, which is the developer and supplier of the instrument.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the study design for developing a generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instrument for cats
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of dot plots for items that were (a) excluded and (b) retained on the basis of their discriminatory potential as assessed by the research team. The x-axis represents the response values selected by owners of healthy (red square) and unhealthy (blue circle) cats
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plots of scores for three domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL; vitality, comfort and emotional wellbeing [EWB]) generated by the owners of 36 healthy control cats and 58 sick cats using the 20-item web-based generic HRQoL instrument. Each blue box represents the scores obtained for between 25% (bottom line) and 75% (top line) of the group, with the line in the middle representing the median score
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fitted line plots of linear regressions performed for three domains of the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instrument. Statistics presented include the residual standard deviation (S) and r values for the three domains. The number of presenting conditions is on the x-axis, whereas the HRQoL scores are on the y-axis

References

    1. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    1. Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A. Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    1. Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 1263–1278. - PubMed
    1. Freeman LM, Rush JE, Oyama MA, et al. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for assessment of health-related quality of life in cats with cardiac disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 240: 1188–1193. - PubMed

Publication types