Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 20;20(2):e50.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.8485.

Ecuadorian Cancer Patients' Preference for Information and Communication Technologies: Cross-Sectional Study

Ivan Cherrez Ojeda #  1   2 , Emanuel Vanegas #  1   2 , Michell Torres #  2 , Juan Carlos Calderón #  1   2 , Erick Calero #  1   2 , Annia Cherrez #  2 , Miguel Felix #  1   2 , Valeria Mata #  2 , Sofia Cherrez #  2 , Daniel Simancas #  3
Affiliations

Ecuadorian Cancer Patients' Preference for Information and Communication Technologies: Cross-Sectional Study

Ivan Cherrez Ojeda et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The instantaneous spread of information, low costs, and broad availability of information and communication technologies (ICTs) make them an attractive platform for managing care, patient communication, and medical interventions in cancer treatment. There is little information available in Latin America about the level of usage of ICTs for and by cancer patients. Our study attempts to fill this gap.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the level of ICT use and patterns of preferences among cancer patients.

Methods: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey study in 500 Ecuadorian cancer patients. This questionnaire consisted of 22 items about demographic and clinical data, together with the preferences of people who use ICTs. Chi-square, crude, and adjusted logistic regressions were performed.

Results: Of the total, 43.2% (216/500) of participants reported that they had access to the Internet, and 25.4% (127/500) reported that they neither owned a cell phone nor did they have access to the Internet. The Internet constituted the highest usage rate as a source of information about malignant diseases (74.3%, 162/218) regardless of age (P<.001). With regard to the preferences on how patients would like to use ICTs to receive information about diseases, WhatsApp (66.5%, 145/218) and short message service (SMS) text messaging (61.0%, 133/218) were widely reported as interesting communication channels. Similarly, WhatsApp (72.0%, 157/218) followed by SMS (63.8%, 139/218) were reported as the preferred ICTs through which patients would like to ask physicians about diseases. Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients aged between 40 and 64 years were more likely to be interested in receiving information through SMS (odds ratio, OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.92-13.32), as well as for asking questions to physicians through this same media (OR 9.78, CI 3.45-27.67) than the oldest group.

Conclusions: WhatsApp, SMS, and email are effective and widely used ICTs that can promote communication between cancer patients and physicians. According to age range, new ICTs such as Facebook are still emerging. Future studies should investigate how to develop and promote ICT-based resources more effectively to engage the outcomes of cancer patients. The widespread use of ICTs narrows the gap between cancer patients with restricted socioeconomic conditions and those with wealth and easily available technological means, thereby opening up new possibilities in low-income countries.

Keywords: Web 2.0; cancer; mHealth; social media; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of malignancies in surveyed population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferences in using information and communication technologies to obtain information about disease by age groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Coughlin SS, Thind H, Liu B, Wilson LC. Towards research-tested smartphone applications for preventing breast cancer. Mhealth. 2016 Jun 21;2:pii.26. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2016.06.02. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2016.06.02. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panayi ND, Mars MM, Burd R. The promise of digital (mobile) health in cancer prevention and treatment. Future Oncol. 2013 May;9(5):613–7. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.42. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perron BE, Taylor HO, Glass JE, Margerum-Leys J. Information and communication technologies in social work. Adv Soc Work. 2010;11(2):67–81. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21691444 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buis LR, Whitten P. Comparison of social support content within online communities for high- and low-survival-rate cancers. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Aug;29(8):461–7. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e318214093b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim B, Gillham DM. The experience of young adult cancer patients described through online narratives. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(5):377–84. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318291b4e9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types