Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Feb 20;8(2):e017931.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017931.

Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Tim Kirkpatrick et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: The 'Engager' programme is a 'through-the-gate' intervention designed to support prisoners with common mental health problems as they transition from prison back into the community. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Engager intervention.

Methods and analysis: The study is a parallel two-group randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to either: (a) the Engager intervention plus standard care (intervention group) or (b) standard care alone (control group) across two investigation centres (South West and North West of England). Two hundred and eighty prisoners meeting eligibility criteria will take part. Engager is a person-centred complex intervention delivered by practitioners and aimed at addressing offenders' mental health and social care needs. It comprises one-to-one support for participants prior to release from prison and for up to 20 weeks postrelease. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure at 6 months postrelease. Secondary outcomes include: assessment of subjective met/unmet need, drug and alcohol use, health-related quality of life and well-being-related quality of life measured at 3, 6 and 12 months postrelease; change in objective social domains, drug and alcohol dependence, service utilisation and perceived helpfulness of services and change in psychological constructs related to desistence at 6 and 12 months postrelease; and recidivism at 12 months postrelease. A process evaluation will assess fidelity of intervention delivery, test hypothesised mechanisms of action and look for unintended consequences. An economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 (ref: 15/WA/0314) and the National Offender Management Service (ref: 2015-283). Findings will be disseminated to commissioners, clinicians and service users via papers and presentations.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN11707331; Pre-results.

Keywords: mental health; prison; protocol; randomised controlled trial; resettlement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Kouyoumdjian FG, McIsaac KE, Liauw J, et al. . A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of persons during imprisonment and in the year after release. Am J Public Health 2015;105:13–33. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302498 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooker C, Repper J, Beverley C, et al. . Mental health services and prisoners: a review, school of health and related research (ScHARR. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, 2002.
    1. Grubin D, Birmingham L, Mason D. The durham remand study, university of Newcastle and Newcastle City health trust, her majesty’s prison service. London: Northern and Yorkshire Regional Health Authority, 1997.
    1. Rotter M, Way B, Steinbacher M, et al. . Personality disorders in prison: aren’t they all antisocial? Psychiatr Q 2002;73:337–49. 10.1023/A:1020468117930 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fazel S, Danesh J. Serious mental disorder in 23000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet 2002;359:545–50. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07740-1 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data