Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;109(4):966-979.
doi: 10.1111/cas.13542. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

Significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

Affiliations

Significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

Shinji Matsutani et al. Cancer Sci. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is becoming increasingly common. However, biomarkers predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy have not been established. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have a crucial effect on tumor progression and survival outcome as the primary host immune response, and an antitumor immune effect has been reported to contribute to the response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We investigated the significance of TILs before and after neoadjuvant treatment and the change in the density of those TILs. Sixty-four patients who underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled. The number of TIL subsets was examined using immunohistochemical staining of pretreatment biopsy samples and post-treatment resected specimens. In both the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort and the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy cohort, a low density of CD8+ TILs in pretreatment biopsy samples was associated with a poor response, and a low density of CD8+ TILs in post-treatment resected specimens was similarly associated with a poor response. In the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy cohort, the density of CD8+ TILs in post-treatment resected specimens was significantly increased compared with that in pretreatment biopsy samples. We concluded that T lymphocyte-mediated immune reactions play an important role in tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer, and the evaluation of TILs in pretreatment biopsy samples might be a predictor of the clinical effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy, especially chemoradiotherapy, could induce the activation of the local immune status.

Keywords: neoadjuvant therapy; predictive marker; rectal cancer; tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immune marker expression of CD4 (A), CD8 (B), t‐box expressed in T cells (C), GATA‐binding protein 3 (D), RAR‐related orphan receptor‐γT (E), and forkhead box P3 (F) in locally advanced rectal cancer specimens. Magnification, ×400
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunoreactive tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes determined at the invasive margin in resected specimens of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. Magnification, ×400
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expression of mismatch repair proteins in resected specimens of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. (A) MLH1: positive. All of the tumor showed MLH1‐positive expression. (B,C) MSH2: positive (B), negative (C). (D,E) MSH6: positive (D), negative (E). (F,G) PMS2: positive (F), negative (G). Magnification, ×400
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Negative expression (<25%) of HLA class I in tissue microarray sections of pretreatment biopsy specimens. (B) Positive expression (>75%) HLA class I in resected specimens of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. Magnification, ×400
Figure 5
Figure 5
One‐to‐one correspondence of the density of CD8+ tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) at pretreatment biopsy and at the surface of the tumor in post‐treatment resected specimens from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Changes in the density of CD8+ TILs in all patients (A) responders (i.e. pathological response grade 1b‐3) (B), and non‐responders (i.e. pathological response grade 0‐1a) (C)
Figure 6
Figure 6
One‐to‐one correspondence of the density of CD8+ tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) at the pretreatment biopsy and at the surface of the tumor in post‐treatment resected specimens from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Changes in the density of CD8+ TILs in all patients (A) responders (i.e. pathological response grade 1b‐3) (B), and non‐responders (i.e. pathological response grade 0‐1a) (C)
Figure 7
Figure 7
One‐to‐one correspondence of the density of CD8+ tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) at the pretreatment biopsy and at the surface of the tumor in post‐treatment resected specimens from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Changes in the density of CD8+ TILs in all patients (A), responders (i.e. pathological response grade 1b‐3) (B), and non‐responders (i.e. pathological response grade 0‐1a) (C)

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69‐90. - PubMed
    1. Rodel C, Liersch T, Becker H, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO‐04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:679‐687. - PubMed
    1. Schrag D, Weiser MR, Goodman KA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without routine use of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a pilot trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:513‐518. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fridman WH, Pages F, Sautes‐Fridman C, Galon J. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:298‐306. - PubMed
    1. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez‐Cabo F, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960‐1964. - PubMed