Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload
- PMID: 29465749
- PMCID: PMC5878696
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10795
Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload
Abstract
Background: Surgeons in the operating theatre deal constantly with high-demand tasks that require simultaneous processing of a large amount of information. In certain situations, high cognitive load occurs, which may impact negatively on a surgeon's performance. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the different methods used to assess surgeons' cognitive load, and a critique of the reliability and validity of current assessment metrics.
Methods: A search strategy encompassing MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, PROSPERO and the Cochrane database was developed to identify peer-reviewed articles published from inception to November 2016. Quality was assessed by using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). A summary table was created to describe study design, setting, specialty, participants, cognitive load measures and MERSQI score.
Results: Of 391 articles retrieved, 84 met the inclusion criteria, totalling 2053 unique participants. Most studies were carried out in a simulated setting (59 studies, 70 per cent). Sixty studies (71 per cent) used self-reporting methods, of which the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was the most commonly applied tool (44 studies, 52 per cent). Heart rate variability analysis was the most used real-time method (11 studies, 13 per cent).
Conclusion: Self-report instruments are valuable when the aim is to assess the overall cognitive load in different surgical procedures and assess learning curves within competence-based surgical education. When the aim is to assess cognitive load related to specific operative stages, real-time tools should be used, as they allow capture of cognitive load fluctuation. A combination of both subjective and objective methods might provide optimal measurement of surgeons' cognition.
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures
References
-
- Tavare A. Where are we with transparency over performance of doctors and institutions? BMJ 2012; 345: e4464. - PubMed
-
- Madani A, Vassiliou MC, Watanabe Y, Al-Halabi B, Al-Rowais MS, Deckelbaum DLet al. . What are the principles that guide behaviors in the operating room?: creating a framework to define and measure performance. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 255–267. - PubMed
-
- Landon BE, Normand SL, Blumenthal D, Daley J. Physician clinical performance assessment: prospects and barriers. JAMA 2003; 290: 1183–1189. - PubMed
-
- Rogers D, Lingard L, Boehler ML, Espin S, Klingensmith M, Mellinger JDet al. . Teaching operating room conflict management to surgeons: clarifying the optimal approach. Med Educ 2011; 45: 939–945. - PubMed
-
- Hyder JA, Roy N, Wakeam E, Hernandez R, Kim SP, Bader AMet al. . Performance measurement in surgery through the National Quality Forum. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219: 1037–1046. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous