Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0190698.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190698. eCollection 2018.

Offspring sex impacts DNA methylation and gene expression in placentae from women with diabetes during pregnancy

Affiliations

Offspring sex impacts DNA methylation and gene expression in placentae from women with diabetes during pregnancy

Jacqueline Alexander et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We hypothesized that diabetes during pregnancy (DDP) alters genome-wide DNA methylation in placenta resulting in differentially methylated loci of metabolically relevant genes and downstream changes in RNA and protein expression.

Methods: We mapped genome-wide DNA methylation with the Infinium 450K Human Methylation Bead Chip in term fetal placentae from Native American and Hispanic women with DDP using a nested case-control design (n = 17 pairs). RNA expression and protein levels were assayed via RNA-Seq and Western Blot.

Results: Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis revealed 465 CpG sites with significant changes for male offspring, 247 for female offspring, and 277 for offspring of both sexes (p<0.001). Placentae from female offspring were 40% more likely to have significant gains in DNA methylation compared with placentae from male offspring exposed to DDP (p<0.001). Changes in DNA methylation corresponded to changes in RNA and protein levels for 6 genes: PIWIL3, CYBA, GSTM1, GSTM5, KCNE1 and NXN. Differential DNA methylation was detected at loci related to mitochondrial function, DNA repair, inflammation, oxidative stress.

Conclusions/interpretation: These findings begin to explain mechanisms responsible for the increased risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes in offspring of mothers with DDP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Maternal and infant characteristics.
a) HgbA1C, b) Parity c) Gestational Age (weeks). *p<0.05. (n = 17 pairs).
Fig 2
Fig 2. CpG sites with significant changes in DNA methylation.
CpG sites with (a) AVDM > 10% and (b) AVDM > 15% and p<0.001. (a and b) Black indicates methylation increase in DDP. Gray region indicates methylation loss in DDP. (c) Genes with > 1 CpG site with significant change in DNA methylation (p<0.001).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Gene regulatory regions of probe sites included on the Infinium 450K Human Methylation Bead Chip.
TSS = Translational Start Site; UTR: Untranslated Region. a: Reference distribution of all probe sites included on the array. b, c and d: Distribution of probe site with AVDM > 10% and p< 0.001. b: All pairs c. Male offspring pairs. d. Female offspring pairs.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Differentially expressed genes in placenta exposed to DDP identified via RNA-Seq (n = 3 pairs per offspring sex).
Black represents differentially expressed transcripts with control > DDP; Gray represents DDP> control. a. Differentially expressed unique transcripts. b. Differentially expressed unique genes. RNA transcripts with expression sum >5, fold change>1.5, and p-value < 0.05.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Protein abundance for genes with changes in DNA methylation and mRNA expression.
a. PIWIL3 b. CYBA c. GSTM1 d. GSTM5 e. KCNE1 f. NXN; a–f: Protein abundance normalized to Actin or cofillin. a: All pairs (N = 14; 7 male pairs and 7 female pairs). b-d: Male offspring pairs (n = 7). e-f: Female offspring pairs (n = 7). * p<0.05; ** p<0.05.

References

    1. Pettitt DJ, Baird HR, Aleck KA, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Excessive obesity in offspring of Pima Indian women with diabetes during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1983;308(5):242–5. Epub 1983/02/03. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198302033080502 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pettitt DJ, Aleck KA, Baird HR, Carraher MJ, Bennett PH, Knowler WC. Congenital susceptibility to NIDDM. Role of intrauterine environment. Diabetes. 1988;37(5):622–8. . - PubMed
    1. Silverman BL, Metzger BE, Cho NH, Loeb CA. Impaired glucose tolerance in adolescent offspring of diabetic mothers. Relationship to fetal hyperinsulinism. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(5):611–7. . - PubMed
    1. Armitage JA, Taylor PD, Poston L. Experimental models of developmental programming: consequences of exposure to an energy rich diet during development. The Journal of physiology. 2005;565(Pt 1):3–8. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.079756 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartolomei MS, Webber AL, Brunkow ME, Tilghman SM. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Genes & development. 1993;7(9):1663–73. . - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms