Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
- PMID: 29471813
- PMCID: PMC5824539
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5190-6
Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Abstract
Background: Access to direct-to-consumer genetic testing services has increased in recent years. However, disparities in knowledge and awareness of these services are not well documented. We examined awareness of genetic testing services by rural/urban and racial/ethnic status.
Methods: Analyses were conducted using pooled cross-sectional data from 4 waves (2011-2014) of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Descriptive statistics compared sample characteristics and information sources by rural/urban residence. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between geography, racial/ethnic status, and awareness of genetic testing, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: Of 13,749 respondents, 16.7% resided in rural areas, 13.8% were Hispanic, and 10.1% were non-Hispanic black. Rural residents were less likely than urban residents to report awareness of genetic testing (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.63-0.87). Compared with non-Hispanic whites, racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to be aware of genetic testing: Hispanic (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.56-0.82); and non-Hispanic black (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61-0.90).
Conclusions: Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences exist in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. These differences may translate into disparities in the uptake of genetic testing, health behavior change, and disease prevention through precision and personalized medicine.
Keywords: Genetic testing; Health disparities; Rural health.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval and participant consent was not necessary as this study involved the use of a previously-published de-identified database. The data used in the study were publically available.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- Lewis NP, Treise D, Hsu SI, Allen WL, Kang H. DTC genetic testing companies fail transparency prescriptions. New Genet Soc. 2011;30(4):291–307. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.600434. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical