Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):277.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5190-6.

Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing

Affiliations

Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing

Ramzi G Salloum et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Access to direct-to-consumer genetic testing services has increased in recent years. However, disparities in knowledge and awareness of these services are not well documented. We examined awareness of genetic testing services by rural/urban and racial/ethnic status.

Methods: Analyses were conducted using pooled cross-sectional data from 4 waves (2011-2014) of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Descriptive statistics compared sample characteristics and information sources by rural/urban residence. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between geography, racial/ethnic status, and awareness of genetic testing, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: Of 13,749 respondents, 16.7% resided in rural areas, 13.8% were Hispanic, and 10.1% were non-Hispanic black. Rural residents were less likely than urban residents to report awareness of genetic testing (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.63-0.87). Compared with non-Hispanic whites, racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to be aware of genetic testing: Hispanic (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.56-0.82); and non-Hispanic black (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61-0.90).

Conclusions: Rural-urban and racial-ethnic differences exist in awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. These differences may translate into disparities in the uptake of genetic testing, health behavior change, and disease prevention through precision and personalized medicine.

Keywords: Genetic testing; Health disparities; Rural health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and participant consent was not necessary as this study involved the use of a previously-published de-identified database. The data used in the study were publically available.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adjusted rates (predicted marginals) for awareness of genetic testing by urban-rural and racial/ethnic categorization across 4 waves of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) from 2011 to 2014, controlling for age, sex, education, income level, and survey year

References

    1. Simonds NI, Khoury MJ, Schully SD, et al. Comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics and precision medicine: current landscape and future prospects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 10.1093/jnci/djt108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg JS, Khoury MJ, Evans JP. Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med. 2011;13(6):499–504. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318220aaba. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frueh FW, Greely HT, Green RC, Hogarth S, Siegel S. The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(7):511–515. doi: 10.1038/nrg3026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis NP, Treise D, Hsu SI, Allen WL, Kang H. DTC genetic testing companies fail transparency prescriptions. New Genet Soc. 2011;30(4):291–307. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.600434. - DOI
    1. Hall MJ, Olopade OI. Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the BRCA box. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(14):2197–2203. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.5889. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms