Get the Lead off Our Backs!
- PMID: 29472000
- DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.003
Get the Lead off Our Backs!
Abstract
Many interventionalists face physical challenges almost daily for years or decades. The burden of assuming awkward positions while carrying extra weight can take its toll on the musculoskeletal system to such an extent that the career is ended or modified to exclude procedural aspects. The proliferation of lighter aprons has unfortunately resulted in reduced protection with poor correlation of protection to labeling due to the inadequacies of testing methods for nonlead materials. The protective quality of the non-leads is not superior to lead-containing composites on a weight basis, and the user no longer knows how well they are protected unless buying aprons containing lead. Various useful methods and shields that may reduce radiation exposure are supported by the floor, ceiling, table, or patient. The suspended personal radiation protection system is a recent development which provides substantially greater radiation protection than conventional lead aprons combined with other shields, while also taking all of the weight off of the operator. It is composed of an expansive and thick (1mm Pb equiv) apron with a large face-shield to protect the neck, head, and eyes, and is suspended overhead to provide motion in the x, y, and z planes. Exposures may also be substantially reduced by leaving the area during acquisition sequences and use of power injectors.
Keywords: musculoskeletal pain; radiation; shielding; spine disease.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Live Without Regret.Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Mar;21(1):1. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 15. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29471993 No abstract available.
-
Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Mar;21(1):2-6. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29471995 Review.
-
Can Aprons Be Properly Evaluated for Their Protective Quality without In-House Validation?J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Dec;27(12):1933-1935.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.08.014. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27886959 No abstract available.
-
Baby on Board: Managing Occupational Radiation Exposure During Pregnancy.Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Mar;21(1):32-36. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 19. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29471998 Review.
-
Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.055. Epub 2018 Oct 3. J Vasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30292602
Cited by
-
Development of Lead-Free Materials for Radiation Shielding in Medical Settings: A Review.J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024 Jun 1;14(3):229-244. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1742. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024. PMID: 39027711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of Back Pain and Lead Apron Use Among Staff at a District General Hospital.Cureus. 2021 Oct 18;13(10):e18859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18859. eCollection 2021 Oct. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34804712 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-X Apron Wearing and Musculoskeletal Problems Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5877. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165877. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32823627 Free PMC article.
-
Time to Look for Ergonomically Viable Designs of Radiation Protection Aprons and Thyroid Shields in Orthopedic Surgery: A Survey of 416 Orthopedic Surgeons.Cureus. 2023 Nov 7;15(11):e48426. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48426. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38073954 Free PMC article.
-
Is navigation beneficial for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy? A preliminary comparison study with fluoroscopic guidance.Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2808-2818. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07624-5. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Eur Spine J. 2023. PMID: 36920512
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical