Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e018618.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018618.

Feasibility of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the acute setting: the LaCeS feasibility trial protocol

Deena Harji  1   2 , Helen Marshall  2 , Katie Gordon  2 , Hannah Crow  2 , Victoria Hiley  2 , Dermot Burke  3 , Ben Griffiths  1 , Catherine Moriarty  3 , Maureen Twiddy  4 , John L O'Dwyer  5 , Azmina Verjee  6 , Julia Brown  2 , Peter Sagar  3
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Feasibility of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the acute setting: the LaCeS feasibility trial protocol

Deena Harji et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Acute colorectal surgery forms a significant proportion of emergency admissions within the National Health Service. There is limited evidence to suggest minimally invasive surgery may be associated with improved clinical outcomes in this cohort of patients. Consequently, there is a need to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery in the acute colorectal setting. However,emergency colorectal surgical trials have previously been difficult to conduct due to issues surrounding recruitment and equipoise. The LaCeS (randomised controlled trial of Laparoscopic versus open Colorectal Surgery in the acute setting) feasibility trial will determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive, phase III trial of laparoscopic versus open acute colorectal resection.

Methods and analysis: The LaCeS feasibility trial is a prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, parallel group, pragmatic randomised controlled feasibility trial. Patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive eitherlaparoscopic or open surgery. The trial aims to recruit at least 66 patients from five acute general surgical units across the UK. Patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of acute colorectal pathology requiring resection on clinical and radiological/endoscopic investigations, with a National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death classification of urgent will be considered eligible for participation. The primary outcome is recruitment. Secondary outcomes include assessing the safety profile of laparoscopic surgery using intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, conversion rates and patient-safety indicators as surrogate markers. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes will also be reported. The trial will contain an embedded qualitative study to assess clinician and patient acceptability of trial processes.

Ethics and dissemination: The LaCeS feasibility trial is approved by the Yorkshire and The Humber, Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 15/ YH/0542). The results from the trial will be presented at national and international colorectal conferences and will be submitted for publication to peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN15681041; Pre-results.

Keywords: adult surgery; clinical trials; colorectal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial schema.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Ethical Considerations and Equipoise in Cancer Surgery.
    Vakili-Ojarood M, Naseri A, Shirinzadeh-Dastgiri A, Saberi A, HaghighiKian SM, Rahmani A, Farnoush N, Nafissi N, Heiranizadeh N, Antikchi MH, Narimani N, Atarod MM, Yeganegi M, Neamatzadeh H. Vakili-Ojarood M, et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;15(Suppl 3):363-373. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02023-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39328740 Free PMC article. Review.
  • What factors determine specimen quality in colon cancer surgery? A cohort study.
    Ng KS, West NP, Scott N, Holzgang M, Quirke P, Jayne DG. Ng KS, et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 May;35(5):869-880. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03541-x. Epub 2020 Feb 28. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020. PMID: 32112199

References

    1. (SEPHO) SEPHO. General surgery: emergency in England 2002/3 to 2004/5: A geographical profile of admissions, 2006.
    1. Dawson EJ, Paterson-Brown S. Emergency general surgery and the implications for specialisation. Surgeon 2004;2:165–70. 10.1016/S1479-666X(04)80079-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mai-Phan TA, Patel B, Walsh M, et al. . Emergency room surgical workload in an inner city UK teaching hospital. World J Emerg Surg 2008;3:19 10.1186/1749-7922-3-19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. al-Ayoubi F, Eriksson H, Myrelid P, et al. . Distribution of emergency operations and trauma in a Swedish hospital: need for reorganisation of acute surgical care? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012;20:66 10.1186/1757-7241-20-66 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Symons NR, Moorthy K, Almoudaris AM, et al. . Mortality in high-risk emergency general surgical admissions. Br J Surg 2013;100:1318–25. 10.1002/bjs.9208 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types