Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan 31:12:14.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00014. eCollection 2018.

EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation of People with Motor Impairment: A Novel Approach of the 21 st Century

Affiliations
Review

EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation of People with Motor Impairment: A Novel Approach of the 21 st Century

Ioulietta Lazarou et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

People with severe neurological impairments face many challenges in sensorimotor functions and communication with the environment; therefore they have increased demand for advanced, adaptive and personalized rehabilitation. During the last several decades, numerous studies have developed brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) with the goals ranging from providing means of communication to functional rehabilitation. Here we review the research on non-invasive, electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI systems for communication and rehabilitation. We focus on the approaches intended to help severely paralyzed and locked-in patients regain communication using three different BCI modalities: slow cortical potentials, sensorimotor rhythms and P300 potentials, as operational mechanisms. We also review BCI systems for restoration of motor function in patients with spinal cord injury and chronic stroke. We discuss the advantages and limitations of these approaches and the challenges that need to be addressed in the future.

Keywords: P300; brain–computer interfaces (BCI); communication; electroencephalogram (EEG); neuromuscular disorders (NMD); rehabilitation; sensorimotor rhythms (SMR); slow cortical potentials (SCP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overview of the review framework.

References

    1. Abdulkader S. N., Atia A., Mostafa M.-S. M. (2015). Brain computer interfacing: applications and challenges. Egypt. Informatics J. 16 213–230. 10.1016/j.eij.2015.06.002 - DOI
    1. Ahn M., Ahn S., Hong J. H., Cho H., Kim K., Kim B. S., et al. (2013). Gamma band activity associated with BCI performance: simultaneous MEG/EEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:848. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00848 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ang K. K., Guan C., Phua K. S., Wang C., Zhao L., Teo W. P., et al. (2015). Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain–computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 96 S79–S87. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arvaneh M., Guan C., Ang K. K., Ward T. E., Chua K. S. G., Kuah C. W. K., et al. (2016). Facilitating motor imagery-based brain–computer interface for stroke patients using passive movement. Neural Comput. Appl. 28 3259–3272. 10.1007/s00521-016-2234-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babiloni F., Cincotti F., Marciani M., Salinari S., Astolfi L., Aloise F., et al. (2009). On the use of brain–computer interfaces outside scientific laboratories toward an application in domotic environments. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 86 133–146. 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86010-8 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources