Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;22(9):3053-3059.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2387-0. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

The use of throat packs in pediatric cleft lip/palate surgery: a retrospective study

Affiliations

The use of throat packs in pediatric cleft lip/palate surgery: a retrospective study

B J A Smarius et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Throat packs are commonly used to prevent ingestion or aspiration of blood and other debris during cleft lip/palate surgery. However, dislodgement or (partial) retainment after extubation could have serious consequences. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of omitting pharyngeal packing during cleft lip/palate surgery on the incidence of early postoperative complications in children.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed on all children who underwent cleft lip/palate surgery at the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital. This study compared the period January 2010 through December 2012 when pharyngeal packing was applied according to local protocol (group A) with the period January 2013 till December 2015 when pharyngeal packing was no longer applied after removal from the protocol (group B). Data were collected for sex, age at operation, cleft lip/palate type, type of repair, lateral incisions, length of hospital stay, and complications in the first 6 weeks after surgery. Early complications included wound dehiscence, postoperative bleeding, infection, fever, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI).

Results: This study included 489 cleft lip/palate operations (group A n = 246, group B n = 243). A total of 39 (15.9%) early complications were recorded in group A and a total of 40 (16.5%) in group B. There were no significant differences (P = 0.902) in complications between the two groups; however, there was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in length of hospital stay between the two groups (group A 3.6 days vs group B 3.2 days).

Conclusion: Omitting routine placement of throat packs in cleft lip/palate surgery was not associated with an increased early postoperative complication rate. Therefore, the traditional, routine placement of a throat pack during cleft lip/palate surgery can be questioned.

Clinical relevance: The traditional, routine placement of a throat pack during cleft lip/palate surgery can be questioned.

Keywords: Cleft lip/palate surgery; Complications; Pharyngeal packing; Throat pack.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scheck PA. A pharyngeal pack fixed on to the tracheal tube. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:892–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb08865.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green RA, Akester J. A combined oropharyngeal airway and dental pack. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:889–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb08864.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vickery IM, Burton GW. Throat packs for surgery. An improved design based on anatomical measurements. Anaesthesia. 1977;32:565–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1977.tb10007.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sexton J, Dohlman L. Benefits of the pharyngeal pack. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:891. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(89)80056-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. To EW, Tsang WM, Yiu F, et al. A missing throat pack. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:383–384. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01976-19.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources