Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 23;7(1):25.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens7010025.

Congenital Toxoplasmosis: A Plea for a Neglected Disease

Affiliations

Congenital Toxoplasmosis: A Plea for a Neglected Disease

Martine Wallon et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Maternal infection by Toxoplasma gondii during pregnancy may have serious consequences for the fetus, ranging from miscarriage, central nervous system involvement, retinochoroiditis, or subclinical infection at birth with a risk of late onset of ocular diseases. As infection in pregnant women is usually symptomless, the diagnosis relies only on serological tests. Some countries like France and Austria have organized a regular serological testing of pregnant women, some others have no prenatal program of surveillance. Reasons for these discrepant attitudes are many and debatable. Among them are the efficacy of antenatal treatment and cost-effectiveness of such a program. A significant body of data demonstrated that rapid onset of treatment after maternal infection reduces the risk and severity of fetal infection. Recent cost-effectiveness studies support regular screening. This lack of consensus put both pregnant women and care providers in a difficult situation. Another reason why congenital toxoplasmosis is disregarded in some countries is the lack of precise information about its impact on the population. Precise estimations on the burden of the disease can be achieved by systematic screening that will avoid bias or underreporting of cases and provide a clear view of its outcome.

Keywords: antenatal treatment efficacy; congenital toxoplasmosis; cost effectiveness; mass screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FP runs reference centers for toxoplasmic serology funded respectively by Abbott and Siemens companies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Montoya J.G., Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1965–1976. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert-Gangneux F., Dardé M.-L. Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012;25:264–296. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05013-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert R.E., Freeman K., Lago E.G., Bahia-Oliveira L.M.G., Tan H.K., Wallon M., Buffolano W., Stanford M.R., Petersen E. European Multicentre Study on Congenital Toxoplasmosis (EMSCOT) Ocular sequelae of congenital toxoplasmosis in Brazil compared with Europe. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2008;2:e277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000277. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carme B., Demar M., Ajzenberg D., Dardé M.L. Severe acquired toxoplasmosis caused by wild cycle of Toxoplasma gondii, French Guiana. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009;15:656–658. doi: 10.3201/eid1504.081306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pena H.F.J., Gennari S.M., Dubey J.P., Su C. Population structure and mouse-virulence of Toxoplasma gondii in Brazil. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008;38:561–569. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.09.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources