Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May;35(5):325-333.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000798.

Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment

Affiliations
Review

Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment

Jean-Louis Vincent et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 May.

Abstract

: Patient monitoring on low acuity general hospital wards is currently based largely on intermittent observations and measurements of simple variables, such as blood pressure and temperature, by nursing staff. Often several hours can pass between such measurements and patient deterioration can go unnoticed. Moreover, the integration and interpretation of the information gleaned through these measurements remains highly dependent on clinical judgement. More intensive monitoring, which is commonly used in peri-operative and intensive care settings, is more likely to lead to the early identification of patients who are developing complications than is intermittent monitoring. Early identification can trigger appropriate management, thereby reducing the need for higher acuity care, reducing hospital lengths of stay and admission costs and even, at times, improving survival. However, this degree of monitoring has thus far been considered largely inappropriate for general hospital ward settings due to device costs and the need for staff expertise in data interpretation. In this review, we discuss some developing options to improve patient monitoring and thus detection of deterioration in low acuity general hospital wards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Oxygen saturation (blue) and heart rate (pink) traces in a patient with obstructive sleep apnoea. (a) Preoperatively. (b) Postoperatively during patient-controlled morphine analgesia.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Compressed capnography patterns in a postoperative patient corresponding to different levels of consciousness (yellow line = respiratory rate). Panel (c) shows recurrent partial airway obstruction.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Continuous pulse oximetry and capnography tracings from a postoperative patient receiving hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia. x = patient-controlled analgesia dosing. o = patient-controlled analgesia halt enabled due to excessive sedation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Integrated patient monitoring on the low acuity ward.

References

    1. Smith GB. In-hospital cardiac arrest: is it time for an in-hospital ’chain of prevention’? Resuscitation 2010; 81:1209–1211. - PubMed
    1. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1368–1375. - PubMed
    1. Sinha S, Ata OB, Khalid U, et al. Failure-to-rescue and interprovider comparisons after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2014; 101:1541–1550. - PubMed
    1. Silber JH, Romano PS, Rosen AK, et al. Failure-to-rescue: comparing definitions to measure quality of care. Med Care 2007; 45:918–925. - PubMed
    1. International Surgical Outcomes Study Group. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 2016; 117:601–609. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms