Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 1;25(6):709-714.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy003.

Communication failure: analysis of prescribers' use of an internal free-text field on electronic prescriptions

Angela Ai  1 , Adrian Wong  1 , Mary Amato  1   2 , Adam Wright  1   3
Affiliations

Communication failure: analysis of prescribers' use of an internal free-text field on electronic prescriptions

Angela Ai et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Importance: Electronic prescribing promises to improve the safety and clarity of prescriptions. However, it also can introduce miscommunication between prescribers and pharmacists. There are situations where information that is meant to be sent to pharmacists is not sent to them, which has the potential for dangerous errors.

Objective: To examine how frequently prescribers or administrative personnel put information intended for pharmacists in a field not sent to pharmacists, classify the type of information included, and assess the potential harm associated with these missed messages.

Design, setting, participants: Medication record data from our legacy electronic health record were requested for ambulatory care patients seen at an academic medical center from January 1, 2000, to May 31, 2015 (20 123 881 records). From this database, 6 060 272 medication orders met our inclusion criteria. We analyzed a random sample of 10 000 medication orders with internal comments.

Main outcomes and measures: Reviewers classified internal comments for intent. Comments intended for pharmacists were also sorted into descriptive categories and analyzed for the potential for patient harm.

Results: We found that 11.7% of the prescriptions in our sample contained comments that were intended to be sent to pharmacists. Many comments contained information about the dose, route, or duration of the prescription (38.0%). Approximately a third of the comments intended for pharmacists contained information that had the potential for significant or severe harm if not communicated.

Conclusion: We found undelivered comments that were clearly intended for pharmacists and contained important information for either pharmacists or patients. This poses a legitimate safety concern, as a portion of comments contained information that could have prevented severe or significant harm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prescription entry window in the LMR. Boxes indicate “Special Instructions” and “Comments.”
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Analysis and classification electronic prescription comments for intent.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Proia KK, Thota AB, Njie GJ et al. , Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2014;471:86–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Misra-Hebert AD, Rabovsky A, Yan C, Hu B, Rothberg MB. A team-based model of primary care delivery and physician-patient interaction. Am J Med. 2015;1289:1025–28. - PubMed
    1. Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;1669:955–64. - PubMed
    1. Smith M, Bates DW, Bodenheimer TS. Pharmacists belong in accountable care organizations and integrated care teams. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;3211:1963–70. - PubMed
    1. Scott MA, Hitch B, Ray L, Colvin G. Integration of pharmacists into a patient-centered medical home. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011;512:161–66. - PubMed

Publication types