Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1251-1259.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy010.

Machine perfusion and long-term kidney transplant recipient outcomes across allograft risk strata

Affiliations

Machine perfusion and long-term kidney transplant recipient outcomes across allograft risk strata

Shaifali Sandal et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. .

Abstract

Background: The use of machine perfusion (MP) in kidney transplantation lowers delayed graft function (DGF) and improves 1-year graft survival in some, but not all, grafts. These associations have not been explored in grafts stratified by the Kidney Donor Profile index (KDPI).

Methods: We analyzed 78 207 deceased-donor recipients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2006 to 2013. The cohort was stratified using the standard criteria donor/expanded criteria donor (ECD)/donation after cardiac death (DCD)/donation after brain death (DBD) classification and the KDPI scores. In each subgroup, MP use was compared with cold storage.

Results: The overall DGF rate was 25.4% and MP use was associated with significantly lower DGF in all but the ECD-DCD donor subgroup. Using the donor source classification, the use of MP did not decrease death-censored graft failure (DCGF), except in the ECD-DCD subgroup from 0 to 1 year {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.98]}. In the ECD-DBD subgroup, higher DCGF from 1 to 5 years was noted [aHR 1.15 (95% CI 1.01-1.31)]. Also, MP did not lower all-cause graft failure except in the ECD-DCD subgroup from 0 to 1 year [aHR = 0.59 (95% CI 0.38-0.91)]. Using the KDPI classification, MP did not lower DCGF or all-cause graft failure, but in the ≤70 subgroup, higher DCGF [aHR 1.16 (95% CI 1.05-1.27)] and higher all-cause graft failure [aHR 1.10 (95% CI 1.02-1.18)] was noted. Lastly, MP was not associated with mortality in any subgroup.

Conclusions: Overall, MP did not lower DCGF. Neither classification better risk-stratified kidneys that have superior graft survival with MP. We question their widespread use in all allografts as an ideal approach to organ preservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Center-level variation: hierarchical multivariate logistic regression models were used to derive the center-specific impact of MP on DGF.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Center-level variation: hierarchical multivariate logistic regression models were used to derive the center-specific impact of MP on 1-year graft failure.

References

    1. Jochmans I, Akhtar MZ, Nasralla D. et al. Past, present, and future of dynamic kidney and liver preservation and resuscitation. Am J Transplant 2016; 16: 2545–2555 - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Fu Z, Zhong Z. et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion decreases renal cell apoptosis During ischemia/reperfusion injury via the Ezrin/AKT pathway. Artif Organs 2016; 40: 129–135 - PubMed
    1. Gallinat A, Efferz P, Paul A. et al. One or 4 h of “in-house” reconditioning by machine perfusion after cold storage improve reperfusion parameters in porcine kidneys. Transpl Int 2014; 27: 1214–1219 - PubMed
    1. Tozzi M, Franchin M, Soldini G. et al. Impact of static cold storage vs hypothermic machine preservation on ischemic kidney graft: inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules as markers of ischemia/reperfusion tissue damage. Our preliminary results. Int J Surg 2013; 11(Suppl 1): S110–S114 - PubMed
    1. Wszola M, Kwiatkowski A, Domagala P. et al. Preservation of kidneys by machine perfusion influences gene expression and may limit ischemia/reperfusion injury. Prog Transplant 2014; 24: 19–26 - PubMed

Publication types