Machine perfusion and long-term kidney transplant recipient outcomes across allograft risk strata
- PMID: 29474675
- PMCID: PMC6030984
- DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy010
Machine perfusion and long-term kidney transplant recipient outcomes across allograft risk strata
Abstract
Background: The use of machine perfusion (MP) in kidney transplantation lowers delayed graft function (DGF) and improves 1-year graft survival in some, but not all, grafts. These associations have not been explored in grafts stratified by the Kidney Donor Profile index (KDPI).
Methods: We analyzed 78 207 deceased-donor recipients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2006 to 2013. The cohort was stratified using the standard criteria donor/expanded criteria donor (ECD)/donation after cardiac death (DCD)/donation after brain death (DBD) classification and the KDPI scores. In each subgroup, MP use was compared with cold storage.
Results: The overall DGF rate was 25.4% and MP use was associated with significantly lower DGF in all but the ECD-DCD donor subgroup. Using the donor source classification, the use of MP did not decrease death-censored graft failure (DCGF), except in the ECD-DCD subgroup from 0 to 1 year {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.98]}. In the ECD-DBD subgroup, higher DCGF from 1 to 5 years was noted [aHR 1.15 (95% CI 1.01-1.31)]. Also, MP did not lower all-cause graft failure except in the ECD-DCD subgroup from 0 to 1 year [aHR = 0.59 (95% CI 0.38-0.91)]. Using the KDPI classification, MP did not lower DCGF or all-cause graft failure, but in the ≤70 subgroup, higher DCGF [aHR 1.16 (95% CI 1.05-1.27)] and higher all-cause graft failure [aHR 1.10 (95% CI 1.02-1.18)] was noted. Lastly, MP was not associated with mortality in any subgroup.
Conclusions: Overall, MP did not lower DCGF. Neither classification better risk-stratified kidneys that have superior graft survival with MP. We question their widespread use in all allografts as an ideal approach to organ preservation.
Figures
References
-
- Jochmans I, Akhtar MZ, Nasralla D. et al. Past, present, and future of dynamic kidney and liver preservation and resuscitation. Am J Transplant 2016; 16: 2545–2555 - PubMed
-
- Zhang Y, Fu Z, Zhong Z. et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion decreases renal cell apoptosis During ischemia/reperfusion injury via the Ezrin/AKT pathway. Artif Organs 2016; 40: 129–135 - PubMed
-
- Gallinat A, Efferz P, Paul A. et al. One or 4 h of “in-house” reconditioning by machine perfusion after cold storage improve reperfusion parameters in porcine kidneys. Transpl Int 2014; 27: 1214–1219 - PubMed
-
- Tozzi M, Franchin M, Soldini G. et al. Impact of static cold storage vs hypothermic machine preservation on ischemic kidney graft: inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules as markers of ischemia/reperfusion tissue damage. Our preliminary results. Int J Surg 2013; 11(Suppl 1): S110–S114 - PubMed
-
- Wszola M, Kwiatkowski A, Domagala P. et al. Preservation of kidneys by machine perfusion influences gene expression and may limit ischemia/reperfusion injury. Prog Transplant 2014; 24: 19–26 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
