Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study
- PMID: 29475110
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.02.011
Pathological fracture risk assessment in patients with femoral metastases using CT-based finite element methods. A retrospective clinical study
Abstract
Physician recommendation for prophylactic surgical fixation of a femur with metastatic bone disease (MBD) is usually based on Mirels' criteria and clinical experience, both of which suffer from poor specificity. This may result in a significant number of these health compromised patients undergoing unnecessary surgery. CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) have been shown to accurately predict strength in femurs with metastatic tumors in an ex-vivo study. In order to assess the utility of CTFEA as a clinical tool to determine the need for fixation of patients with MBD of the femur, an ad hoc CTFEA was performed on a retrospective cohort of fifty patients. Patients with CT scans appropriate for CTFEA analysis were analyzed. Group 1 was composed of 5 MBD patients who presented with a pathologic femoral fracture and had a scan of their femurs just prior to fracture. Group 2 was composed of 45 MBD patients who were scheduled for a prophylactic surgery because of an impending femoral fracture. CTFEA models were constructed for both femurs for all patients, loaded with a hip contact force representing stance position loading accounting for the patient's weight and femur anatomy. CTFEA analysis of Group 1 patients revealed that they all had higher tumor associated strains compared to typical non-diseased femur bone strains at the same region (>45%). Based on analysis of the 5 patients in Group 1, the ratio between the absolute maximum principal strain in the vicinity of the tumor and the typical median strain in the region of the tumor of healthy bones (typical strain fold ratio) was found to be the 1.48. This was considered to be the predictive threshold for a pathological femoral fracture. Based on this typical strain fold ratio, twenty patients (44.4%) in Group 2 were at low risk of fracture and twenty-five patients (55.5%) high risk of fracture. Eleven patients in Group 2 choose not to have surgery and none fractured in the 5month follow-up period. CTFEA predicted that seven of these patients were below the pathological fracture threshold and four above, for a specificity of 63% Based on CTFEA, 39% of the patients with femoral MBD who were referred and underwent prophylactic stabilization may not have needed surgery. These results indicate that a prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating CTFEA as a criterion for determining the need for surgical stabilization in patients with MBD of the femur may be warranted.
Keywords: CTFEA; Femur; Finite element analysis; Metastases; Pathological fracture.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?Bone Joint J. 2020 May;102-B(5):638-645. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1328.R2. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 32349590
-
Finite element analysis potentially identifies nonessential prophylactic stabilization in femurs with metastatic disease.Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2022 Sep;236(9):1297-1308. doi: 10.1177/09544119221109740. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2022. PMID: 35787214
-
Examining agreement between finite element modelling methodologies in predicting pathological fracture risk in proximal femurs with bone metastases.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023 Apr;104:105931. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105931. Epub 2023 Mar 6. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023. PMID: 36906986
-
[Prediction of bone strength using a CT based finite element method].Clin Calcium. 2006 Dec;16(12):2043-51. Clin Calcium. 2006. PMID: 17142936 Review. Japanese.
-
Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.J Orthop Res. 2020 Jun;38(6):1175-1190. doi: 10.1002/jor.24660. Epub 2020 Mar 23. J Orthop Res. 2020. PMID: 32162711 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Breast Cancer Induced Bone Osteolysis Prediction Using Temporal Variational Autoencoders.BME Front. 2022 Apr 2;2022:9763284. doi: 10.34133/2022/9763284. eCollection 2022. BME Front. 2022. PMID: 37850158 Free PMC article.
-
Fracture Risk of Long Bone Metastases: A Review of Current and New Decision-Making Tools for Prophylactic Surgery.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;13(15):3662. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153662. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34359563 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mirels Scores in Patients Undergoing Prophylactic Stabilization for Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease in the Veterans Administration Healthcare System.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Sep;4(9):e20.00141. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00141. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020. PMID: 32890013 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cancer Patients with Bone Metastasis.Prog Rehabil Med. 2022 May 18;7:20220027. doi: 10.2490/prm.20220027. eCollection 2022. Prog Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID: 35633758 Free PMC article.
-
CORR Insights®: Is There an Association Between Prophylactic Femur Stabilization and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):547-549. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000880. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 31389883 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical