Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
- PMID: 29477404
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010
Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?
Abstract
Background: The relative benefits and risks of screening programs for breast cancer have been extensively debated.
Objectives: To quantify and investigate heterogeneity in women's preferences for the benefits and risks of a national breast screening program (NBSP) and to understand the effect of risk communication format on these preferences.
Methods: An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed to elicit preferences from female members of the public for an NBSP described by three attributes (probability of detecting a cancer, risk of unnecessary follow-up, and out-of-pocket screening costs). Survey respondents were randomized to one of two surveys, presenting risk either as percentages only or as icon arrays and percentages. Respondents were required to choose between two hypothetical NBSPs or no screening in 11 choice sets generated using a Bayesian D-efficient design. The trade-offs women made were analyzed using heteroskedastic conditional logit and scale-adjusted latent class models.
Results: A total of 1018 women completed the discrete choice experiment (percentages-only version = 507; icon arrays and percentages version = 511). The results of the heteroskedastic conditional logit model suggested that, on average, women were willing-to-accept 1.72 (confidence interval 1.47-1.97) additional unnecessary follow-ups and willing-to-pay £79.17 (confidence interval £66.98-£91.35) for an additional cancer detected per 100 women screened. Latent class analysis indicated substantial heterogeneity in preferences with six latent classes and three scale classes providing the best fit. The risk communication format received was not a predictor of scale class or preference class membership.
Conclusions: Most women were willing to trade-off the benefits and risks of screening, but decision makers seeking to improve uptake should consider the disparate needs of women when configuring services.
Keywords: breast screening; discrete choice experiment; risk; willingness-to-pay.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):939-947. doi: 10.1002/pon.5041. Epub 2019 Mar 24. Psychooncology. 2019. PMID: 30812068 Free PMC article.
-
Women's Benefits and Harms Trade-Offs in Breast Cancer Screening: Results from a Discrete-Choice Experiment.Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Value Health. 2018. PMID: 29304944
-
Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment.Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):586-600. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241254828. Epub 2024 Jun 3. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 38828503 Free PMC article.
-
Public Preference Heterogeneity and Predicted Uptake Rate of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening Programs in Rural China: Discrete Choice Experiments and Latent Class Analysis.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 10;9:e42898. doi: 10.2196/42898. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023. PMID: 37428530 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing women's stated preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11847-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 39609836 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
"I Was Trying to Do the Maths": Exploring the Impact of Risk Communication in Discrete Choice Experiments.Patient. 2019 Feb;12(1):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0326-4. Patient. 2019. PMID: 30099692 Clinical Trial.
-
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug;43(8):879-936. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y. Epub 2025 May 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2025. PMID: 40397369 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services.Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):939-947. doi: 10.1002/pon.5041. Epub 2019 Mar 24. Psychooncology. 2019. PMID: 30812068 Free PMC article.
-
Women's preferences, willingness-to-pay, and predicted uptake for single-nucleotide polymorphism gene testing to guide personalized breast cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 18;12:1837-1852. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S171348. eCollection 2018. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018. PMID: 30271127 Free PMC article.
-
How Synthesis Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241293796. doi: 10.1177/23814683241293796. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun. MDM Policy Pract. 2025. PMID: 39995777 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical