Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;45(6):1031-1040.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3940-4. Epub 2018 Feb 24.

Hybrid MR-PET of brain tumours using amino acid PET and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI

Affiliations
Free article

Hybrid MR-PET of brain tumours using amino acid PET and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI

N A da Silva et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: PET using radiolabelled amino acids has become a promising tool in the diagnostics of gliomas and brain metastasis. Current research is focused on the evaluation of amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MR imaging for brain tumour imaging. In this hybrid MR-PET study, brain tumours were compared using 3D data derived from APT-CEST MRI and amino acid PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET).

Methods: Eight patients with gliomas were investigated simultaneously with 18F-FET PET and APT-CEST MRI using a 3-T MR-BrainPET scanner. CEST imaging was based on a steady-state approach using a B1 average power of 1μT. B0 field inhomogeneities were corrected a Prametric images of magnetisation transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and differences to the extrapolated semi-solid magnetisation transfer reference method, APT# and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE#), were calculated. Statistical analysis of the tumour-to-brain ratio of the CEST data was performed against PET data using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test.

Results: A tumour-to-brain ratio derived from APT# and 18F-FET presented no significant differences, and no correlation was found between APT# and 18F-FET PET data. The distance between local hot spot APT# and 18F-FET were different (average 20 ± 13 mm, range 4-45 mm).

Conclusion: For the first time, CEST images were compared with 18F-FET in a simultaneous MR-PET measurement. Imaging findings derived from18F-FET PET and APT CEST MRI seem to provide different biological information. The validation of these imaging findings by histological confirmation is necessary, ideally using stereotactic biopsy.

Keywords: 18F-FET PET; APT; CEST; Glioma; Hybrid MR-PET.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):7163-70 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e104181 - PubMed
    1. Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Mar;44(3):408-416 - PubMed
    1. NMR Biomed. 2014 Feb;27(2):163-74 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources