Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jan-Dec:12:1753466618760133.
doi: 10.1177/1753466618760133.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment in patients with very low FEV1: an observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Endoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment in patients with very low FEV1: an observational study

Marcel Simon et al. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic lung volume reduction coil (LVRC) treatment is a therapeutic option for selected patients with advanced emphysema. The effects and the safety of endoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with very low forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) remain to be determined. This study was conducted to assess the effects and the safety of LVRC treatment in patients with very low FEV1.

Methods: The study was performed as a retrospective observational study in the Department of Respiratory Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf on patients with very low FEV1, defined as an FEV1 ⩽ 20% of predicted at baseline in whom LVRC treatment was performed between 1 April 2012 and 28 February 2017.

Results: LVRC treatment was performed in 33 patients with very low FEV1. Of these, 45.5% were female and 54.5% were male. At baseline, mean FEV1 was 0.46 ± 0.12 liters (15 ± 3% of predicted), mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 1.61 ± 0.62 liters (42 ± 13% of predicted), mean residual volume (RV) was 6.03 ± 0.81 liters (275 ± 51% of predicted) and 6-minute walk distance was 229 ± 102 m. Bilateral LVRC treatment was completed in 21 of these patients (63.6%). Bilateral LVRC treatment led to significant improvements in functional parameters with an increase in mean FEV1 from 0.44 ± 0.11 liters to 0.54 ± 0.12 liters ( p = 0.001), equivalent to a relative improvement of 24.5 ± 26.9%, an increase in mean FVC from 1.49 ± 0.54 liters to 1.84 ± 0.49 liters ( p = 0.001), a decrease in mean RV from 6.27 ± 0.83 liters to 5.83 ± 1.09 liters ( p = 0.004) and an improvement in 6-minute walk distance from 218 ± 91 m to 266 ± 96 m ( p = 0.01). There were no cases of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and no deaths.

Conclusions: LVRC treatment was effective and safe in patients with very low FEV1.

Keywords: emphysema; endoscopic lung volume reduction; endoscopic lung volume reduction coil; interventional pulmonology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram illustrating the process of case selection. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expired volume in one second; LVRC, endoscopic lung volume reduction coil.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Functional parameters at baseline and follow up for patients completing bilateral lung volume reduction coil (LVRC) treatment and for patients with unilateral treatment only. Follow-up values in patients completing bilateral treatment were collected at a median of 84 days after the first procedure and at a median of 49 days after the second procedure. *Values for patients with unilateral LVRC treatment only. Follow-up values in patients treated unilaterally only were collected at a median of 70 days after the procedure. FEV1, forced expired volume in one second; FVC, forced vital capacity; n.s., not statistically significant; RV, residual volume; 6-MWT, 6-minute walk test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 557–582. - PubMed
    1. Gagnon P, Guenette JA, Langer D, et al. Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2014; 9: 187–201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson GT. Why does the lung hyperinflate? Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3: 176–179. - PubMed
    1. Shah PL, Herth FJ, van Geffen WH, et al. Lung volume reduction for emphysema. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 147–156. - PubMed
    1. Fishman A, Martinez F, Naunheim K, et al. A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2059–2073. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources