Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 26;12(2):e0006261.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006261. eCollection 2018 Feb.

Leprosy among schoolchildren in the Amazon region: A cross-sectional study of active search and possible source of infection by contact tracing

Affiliations

Leprosy among schoolchildren in the Amazon region: A cross-sectional study of active search and possible source of infection by contact tracing

Valderiza Lourenço Pedrosa et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The high rate of leprosy cases among children under 15 years of age in Brazil indicates ongoing transmission within the community. The identification of the new leprosy cases among contacts can help identify the source of infection and interrupt the transmission chain. This study aims to determine the detection rate of previously undiagnosed cases of leprosy among schoolchildren who are under 15 years of age living in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, and their possible source of infection by contact tracing.

Methodology/principal findings: This was a school-based, cross-sectional study in which the identification of active leprosy cases was conducted in 277 out of 622 randomly selected public schools in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Suspected cases of leprosy were referred to the Alfredo da Matta Foundation, a reference center for leprosy in Manaus. A total of 34,547 schoolchildren were examined, and 40 new leprosy cases were diagnosed. Among new cases, 57.5% were males, and 80.0% demonstrated paucibacillary leprosy. A total of 196 of 206 registered contacts were screened, and 52.5% of the newly diagnosed children's cases had at least one positive household contact. In these contacts, grandparents (52.4%) were the most common co-prevalent cases, while 14.3% were uncles, 9.5% were parents and 9.5% were granduncles. Seven contacts (5.0%), including four siblings of child patients were newly diagnosed. Our data indicate that the prevalence is 11.58 per 10,000, which is 17 times higher than the registered rate.

Conclusions/significance: This study suggests that the detection rate of leprosy among schoolchildren may have remained unchanged over the past thirty years. It also indicates that that active case finding is necessary for reaching the World Health Organization's goals of zero detection among children, especially in endemic areas where the prevalence of leprosy is obscure. Moreover, we assert that all children must have their household contacts examined in order to identify the possible source of infection and interrupt the disease's transmission. Novel strategies to reinforce contact tracing associated with large-scale strategies of chemo- and immune-prophylaxis should be expanded to prevent the perpetuation of the disease cycle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Scheme of laboratory tests performed to support clinical diagnosis.
Of the 40 newly diagnosed cases of leprosy, 37 patients received a SSS test, 34 had histopathological examinations, and 26 had a PCR. SB: skin biopsy; SSS: slit skin smear; I: indeterminate; TT: tuberculoid-tuberculoid; BT: borderline-tuberculoid; BL: borderline-lepromatous; LL: lepromatous-lepromatous; MB: multibacillary; and PB: paucibacillary leprosy.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Genograms of schoolchildren #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9.
Genograms showing the possible source of infection with M. leprae among nine newly diagnosed leprosy cases.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Talhari S, Penna GO, Gonçalves HS, Oliveira MLW. Hanseníase. 5. ed Manaus: Dilivros; 2015. pp. 1–6.
    1. Sundar Rao PS, Jesudasan K, Mani K, Christian M. Impact of MDT on incidence rates of leprosy among household contacts. Part 1. Baseline data. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1989;57: 647–51. - PubMed
    1. de Matos HJ, Duppre N, Alvim MFS, Vieira LMM, Sarno EN, Struchiner CJ. Epidemiologia da hanseníase em coorte de contatos intradomiciliares no Rio de Janeiro (1987–1991). Cad Saude Publica. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 1999;15: 533–542. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X1999000300010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hacker M de A, Duppre NC, Nery JAC, Sales AM, Sarno EN. Characteristics of leprosy diagnosed through the surveillance of contacts: a comparison with index cases in Rio de Janeiro, 1987–2010. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2012;107: 49–54. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762012000900009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beiguelman B. An Appraisal of Genetic Studies on Leprosy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). Cambridge University Press; 1972;21: 21–52. doi: 10.1017/S1120962300011094 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms