Citywide cluster randomized trial to restore blighted vacant land and its effects on violence, crime, and fear
- PMID: 29483246
- PMCID: PMC5866574
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718503115
Citywide cluster randomized trial to restore blighted vacant land and its effects on violence, crime, and fear
Abstract
Vacant and blighted urban land is a widespread and potentially risky environmental condition encountered by millions of people on a daily basis. About 15% of the land in US cities is deemed vacant or abandoned, an area roughly the size of Switzerland. In a citywide cluster randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effects of standardized, reproducible interventions that restore vacant land on the commission of violence, crime, and the perceptions of fear and safety. Quantitative and ethnographic analyses were included in a mixed-methods approach to more fully test and explicate our findings. A total of 541 randomly sampled vacant lots were randomly assigned into treatment and control study arms; outcomes from police and 445 randomly sampled participants were analyzed over a 38-month study period. Participants living near treated vacant lots reported significantly reduced perceptions of crime (-36.8%, P < 0.05), vandalism (-39.3%, P < 0.05), and safety concerns when going outside their homes (-57.8%, P < 0.05), as well as significantly increased use of outside spaces for relaxing and socializing (75.7%, P < 0.01). Significant reductions in crime overall (-13.3%, P < 0.01), gun violence (-29.1%, P < 0.001), burglary (-21.9%, P < 0.001), and nuisances (-30.3%, P < 0.05) were also found after the treatment of vacant lots in neighborhoods below the poverty line. Blighted and vacant urban land affects people's perceptions of safety, and their actual, physical safety. Restoration of this land can be an effective and scalable infrastructure intervention for gun violence, crime, and fear in urban neighborhoods.
Keywords: criminology; environment; epidemiology; ethnography; human geography.
Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bowman AO, Pagano MA. Terra Incognita: Vacant Land and Urban Strategies. Georgetown Univ Press; Washington, DC: 2010.
-
- Nickerson C, Ebel R, Borchers A, Carriazo F. 2011. Major uses of land in the United States, 2007 (USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC), EIB-89.
-
- Németh J, Langhorst J. Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities. 2014;40:143–150.
-
- Pritchett WE. The “public menace” of blight: Urban renewal and the private uses of eminent domain. Yale Law Policy Rev. 2003;21:1–52.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
