Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;44(1):1-5.
doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.49321. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Sperm DNA and detection of DNA fragmentations in sperm

Affiliations
Review

Sperm DNA and detection of DNA fragmentations in sperm

Niyazi Küçük. Turk J Urol. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

The questionable effectiveness of routine sperm parameters in determining male factor infertility problems and increasing the success rates of assisted reproductive techniques have led to the investigation of more detailed sperm parameters that could affect the male fertility and reproduction. Thus, the effects of different sperm parameters such as sperm DNA integrity was started to be investigated thanks to the previously described methods such as single cell gel electrophoresis (COMET) assay, sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), acridine orange test (AOT), terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine (TdT) triphosphate (dUTP) nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay and sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test. However, studying on sperm DNA might be very complex because the sperm DNA differs from the somatic cell DNA with its unique structure. Also, the sperm DNA undergoes many changes during spermatogenesis and it is condensed by being packaged tightly with different types and numbers of protamines in different species. Despite all these difficulties, these methods provide important information about the reasons and consequences of DNA damages in sperm and the effects of these damages on reproduction.

Keywords: COMET; DNA fragmentation; SCD test; SCSA; TUNEL; sperm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the author.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Samplaski MK, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Sabanegh E. New generation of diagnostic tests for infertility: Review of specialized semen tests. Int J Urol. 2010;17:839–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02619.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. Int J Androl. 2002;23:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma RK, Said T, Agarwal A. Sperm DNA damage and its clinical relevance in assessing reproductive outcome. Asian J Androl. 2004;6:139–48. - PubMed
    1. Ward WS, Coffey DS. DNA Packaging and Organization in Mammalian Spermatozoa: Comparison with Somatic Cells. Biol Reprod. 1991;44:569–74. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod44.4.569. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wyrobek AJ, Meistrich ML, Furrer R, Bruce WR. Physical characteristics of mouse sperm nuclei. Biophys J. 1976;16:811–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85730-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources