Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb 26;4(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5.

CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

João Gustavo Claudino et al. Sports Med Open. .

Abstract

Background: CrossFit is recognized as one of the fastest growing high-intensity functional training modes in the world. However, scientific data regarding the practice of CrossFit is sparse. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the findings of scientific literature related to CrossFit via systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Systematic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Bireme/MedLine, and SciELO online databases were conducted for articles reporting the effects of CrossFit training. The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The Oxford Levels of Evidence was used for all included articles, and only studies that investigated the effects of CrossFit as a training program were included in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, effect sizes (ESs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using a random-effects model.

Results: Thirty-one articles were included in the systematic review and four were included in the meta-analysis. However, only two studies had a high level of evidence at low risk of bias. Scientific literature related to CrossFit has reported on body composition, psycho-physiological parameters, musculoskeletal injury risk, life and health aspects, and psycho-social behavior. In the meta-analysis, significant results were not found for any variables.

Conclusions: The current scientific literature related to CrossFit has few studies with high level of evidence at low risk of bias. However, preliminary data has suggested that CrossFit practice is associated with higher levels of sense of community, satisfaction, and motivation.

Keywords: High-intensity functional training; High-intensity interval training; Training load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors – João Gustavo Claudino, Tim J. Gabbett, Frank Bourgeois, Helton de Sá Souza, Rafael Chagas Miranda, Bruno Mezêncio, Rafael Soncin, Carlos Alberto Cardoso Filho, Martim Bottaro, Arnaldo Jose Hernandez, Alberto Carlos Amadio and Julio Cerca Serrão – declare that they have no conflicting interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias and level of evidence
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis of short-term intervention studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beers E. Virtuosity goes viral. CrossFit J. 2014;6:1–10.
    1. Glassman G. What is fitness. CrossFit J. 2002;3:1–11.
    1. Glassman G. Understanding CrossFit. CrossFit J. 2007;56:1–2.
    1. Sprey JWC, Ferreira T, de Lima MV, Duarte A, Jorge PB, Santili C. An epidemiological profile of crossfit athletes in Brazil. Orthop J Sport Med. 2016;4:1–6. doi: 10.1177/2325967116663706. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisker FY, Kildegaard S, Thygesen M, Grosen K, Pfeiffer-Jensen M. Acute tendon changes in intense CrossFit workout: an observational cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 10.1111/sms.12781. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources