CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 29484512
- PMCID: PMC5826907
- DOI: 10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5
CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: CrossFit is recognized as one of the fastest growing high-intensity functional training modes in the world. However, scientific data regarding the practice of CrossFit is sparse. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the findings of scientific literature related to CrossFit via systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: Systematic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Bireme/MedLine, and SciELO online databases were conducted for articles reporting the effects of CrossFit training. The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The Oxford Levels of Evidence was used for all included articles, and only studies that investigated the effects of CrossFit as a training program were included in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, effect sizes (ESs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using a random-effects model.
Results: Thirty-one articles were included in the systematic review and four were included in the meta-analysis. However, only two studies had a high level of evidence at low risk of bias. Scientific literature related to CrossFit has reported on body composition, psycho-physiological parameters, musculoskeletal injury risk, life and health aspects, and psycho-social behavior. In the meta-analysis, significant results were not found for any variables.
Conclusions: The current scientific literature related to CrossFit has few studies with high level of evidence at low risk of bias. However, preliminary data has suggested that CrossFit practice is associated with higher levels of sense of community, satisfaction, and motivation.
Keywords: High-intensity functional training; High-intensity interval training; Training load.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All authors – João Gustavo Claudino, Tim J. Gabbett, Frank Bourgeois, Helton de Sá Souza, Rafael Chagas Miranda, Bruno Mezêncio, Rafael Soncin, Carlos Alberto Cardoso Filho, Martim Bottaro, Arnaldo Jose Hernandez, Alberto Carlos Amadio and Julio Cerca Serrão – declare that they have no conflicting interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Physiological effects of regular CrossFit® training and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic-A systematic review.Front Physiol. 2023 Apr 5;14:1146718. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1146718. eCollection 2023. Front Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37089417 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological variables of CrossFit participants: a systematic review.Sport Sci Health. 2021;17(1):21-41. doi: 10.1007/s11332-020-00685-9. Epub 2020 Aug 29. Sport Sci Health. 2021. PMID: 32904532 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CrossFit®: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit® Performance.Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112. Sports (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37368562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Injury risk and injury incidence rates in CrossFit.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Jul;60(7):1005-1013. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10615-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020. PMID: 32343082 Review.
-
Characterization of Hormonal, Metabolic, and Inflammatory Responses in CrossFit® Training: A Systematic Review.Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 28;11:1001. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01001. eCollection 2020. Front Physiol. 2020. PMID: 32982775 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Functional assessment of respiratory muscles and lung capacity of CrossFit athletes.J Exerc Rehabil. 2023 Feb 23;19(1):67-74. doi: 10.12965/jer.2244594.297. eCollection 2023 Feb. J Exerc Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 36910685 Free PMC article.
-
Physiological responses after two different CrossFit workouts.Biol Sport. 2022 Mar;39(2):231-236. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.102928. Epub 2021 Apr 9. Biol Sport. 2022. PMID: 35309530 Free PMC article.
-
The MedXFit-study - CrossFit as a workplace health intervention: a one-year, prospective, controlled, longitudinal, intervention study.Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 21;12:1304721. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1304721. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38450146 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Non-Traditional Physical Education Classes Improve High School Students' Movement Competency and Fitness: A Mixed-Methods Program Evaluation Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 22;20(10):5914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105914. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37239640 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of blood biomarkers and sports performance in crossfit athletes using the elevation training mask 2.0 post SARS-CoV-2 infection.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(1):29547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14916-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40797088 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beers E. Virtuosity goes viral. CrossFit J. 2014;6:1–10.
-
- Glassman G. What is fitness. CrossFit J. 2002;3:1–11.
-
- Glassman G. Understanding CrossFit. CrossFit J. 2007;56:1–2.
-
- Fisker FY, Kildegaard S, Thygesen M, Grosen K, Pfeiffer-Jensen M. Acute tendon changes in intense CrossFit workout: an observational cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 10.1111/sms.12781. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical