Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Sep;32(9):3909-3917.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6130-3. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the repair of congenital duodenal obstructions in infants and children

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the repair of congenital duodenal obstructions in infants and children

Stefan Gfroerer et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstruction (LCDO) was described more than 15 years ago. However, studies comparing outcomes of LCDO with open repair (OCDO) are rare. Standardized assessments of complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the comprehensive complication index (CCI) are not available.

Methods: All patients undergoing OCDO or LCDO between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the institutional database by retrospective analysis. Postoperative outcomes were assessed, including all complications using the CDC and the CCI.

Results: Forty-seven consecutive patients were identified; 27 patients underwent LCDO and 20 patients had OCDO. Both groups did not differ regarding demographics, associated congenital anomalies, intraoperative pathologic findings, and operative procedures. LCDO was associated with a longer operative time [mean (SD), 202 (89) vs. 112 (41) min, P < 0.0001], shorter time to initiation of feeds [median (range), 1 (0-4) vs. 3 (1-12) days, P = 0.0027], and shorter time to full feeds [mean (SD), 8.2 (4.1) vs. 12.2 (6.4) days, P = 0.0243] compared to OCDO. Shorter length of postoperative hospital stay in LCDO group was achieved for patients without cardiac anomalies [mean (SD), 9.4 (3.1) days in LCDO group vs. 17.2 (9.4) days in OCDO, P = 0.0396] and patients without other anomalies [median (range), 12 (3-38) days in LCDO group vs. 21 (7-31) days in OCDO, P = 0.0460]. LCDO was associated with a lower CCI [median (range) 0 (0-39.7) vs. 4.3 (0-100), P = 0.0270].

Conclusions: Despite a longer operative time for LCDO, a number of advantages of LCDO over OCDO were recognized comparing both approaches in the repair of congenital duodenal obstruction. Such advantages include a lower morbidity, reduced time to initiation and completion of full enteral feeds, and shorter length of postoperative hospitalization for patients without concomitant cardiac anomalies and for patients without other anomalies when operated laparoscopic. In view of the present results, LCDO, performed in selected patients, appears to represent a viable alternative to OCDO.

Keywords: Clavien–Dindo classification; Comprehensive complication index; Congenital duodenal obstruction; Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy; Laparoscopic versus open; Morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World J Surg. 1993 May-Jun;17(3):301-9 - PubMed
    1. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Oct;23(10):881-4 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Oct;28(10):997-1000 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 May;44(5):906-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1995 Oct;9(10):1123-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources