Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication
- PMID: 29487213
- PMCID: PMC5856527
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115
Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication
Abstract
In keeping with the growing movement in scientific publishing toward transparency in data and methods, we propose changes to journal authorship policies and procedures to provide insight into which author is responsible for which contributions, better assurance that the list is complete, and clearly articulated standards to justify earning authorship credit. To accomplish these goals, we recommend that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (docs.casrai.org/CRediT) methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and require authors to use the ORCID persistent digital identifier (https://orcid.org). Additionally, we recommend that universities and research institutions articulate expectations about author roles and responsibilities to provide a point of common understanding for discussion of authorship across research teams. Furthermore, we propose that funding agencies adopt the ORCID identifier and accept the CRediT taxonomy. We encourage scientific societies to further authorship transparency by signing on to these recommendations and promoting them through their meetings and publications programs.
Keywords: authorship principles; research transparency; scientific integrity.
Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: M. McNutt is president of the National Academy of Sciences, the publisher of PNAS. I.V. was Editor-in-chief of PNAS until January 1, 2018. V.K. serves as Chair of the ORCID Board of Directors in a volunteer capacity. Several authors' employers are ORCID member organizations.
Comment in
-
Overdue: a US advisory board for research integrity.Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7743):173-175. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00519-w. Nature. 2019. PMID: 30742085 No abstract available.
-
Submissions to CMI: a new CMI guide for authors.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Nov;25(11):1299. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.07.029. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019. PMID: 31401174 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clarifying middle authorship contributions to reduce abuses in science publishing and assessment of top-ranked SJR biochemistry and pharmacology journals' authorship criteria.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;397(12):10215-10221. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03277-3. Epub 2024 Jul 10. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38985314
-
Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research?PLoS One. 2017 Jun 26;12(6):e0179956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179956. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28650967 Free PMC article.
-
Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations.Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Feb 21;145:w14108. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14108. eCollection 2015. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015. PMID: 25701667
-
'Author Contribution Details' and not 'Authorship Sequence' as a merit to determine credit: A need to relook at the current Indian practice.Natl Med J India. 2020 Jan-Feb;33(1):24-30. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.308238. Natl Med J India. 2020. PMID: 33565483 Review.
-
[Authorship and Inappropriate Authorship from an Ethical Publication Perspective].J Korean Soc Radiol. 2022 Jul;83(4):752-758. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0040. Epub 2022 Jul 22. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36238903 Free PMC article. Review. Korean.
Cited by
-
A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers.Sci Data. 2018 Nov 20;5:180259. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.259. Sci Data. 2018. PMID: 30457573 Free PMC article.
-
On the difficulties of being rigorous in environmental geochemistry studies: some recommendations for designing an impactful paper.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jan;27(2):1267-1275. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06835-y. Epub 2019 Nov 19. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020. PMID: 31745782
-
Dataset of identified scholars mentioned in acknowledgement statements.Sci Data. 2022 Aug 1;9(1):461. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01585-y. Sci Data. 2022. PMID: 35915099 Free PMC article.
-
Authorship practices must evolve to support collaboration and open science.PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 13;21(10):e3002364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002364. eCollection 2023 Oct. PLoS Biol. 2023. PMID: 37831717 Free PMC article.
-
Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 31;25:e51584. doi: 10.2196/51584. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37651164 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pennock RT. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research. Public Aff Q. 1996;10:379–393. - PubMed
-
- Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA. 1994;271:469–471. - PubMed
-
- Ghan S, et al. Author contributions can be clarified. J Geophys Res D Atmospheres. 2016;121:8155.
-
- Bošnjak L, Marušić A. Prescribed practices of authorship: Review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines. Scientometrics. 2012;93:751–763.
-
- Laurance WF. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists. Nature. 2006;442:26. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical