Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2557-2560.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication

Marcia K McNutt  1 , Monica Bradford  2 , Jeffrey M Drazen  3 , Brooks Hanson  4 , Bob Howard  5 , Kathleen Hall Jamieson  6 , Véronique Kiermer  7 , Emilie Marcus  8 , Barbara Kline Pope  9 , Randy Schekman  10   11 , Sowmya Swaminathan  12 , Peter J Stang  13 , Inder M Verma  14
Affiliations

Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication

Marcia K McNutt et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

In keeping with the growing movement in scientific publishing toward transparency in data and methods, we propose changes to journal authorship policies and procedures to provide insight into which author is responsible for which contributions, better assurance that the list is complete, and clearly articulated standards to justify earning authorship credit. To accomplish these goals, we recommend that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (docs.casrai.org/CRediT) methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and require authors to use the ORCID persistent digital identifier (https://orcid.org). Additionally, we recommend that universities and research institutions articulate expectations about author roles and responsibilities to provide a point of common understanding for discussion of authorship across research teams. Furthermore, we propose that funding agencies adopt the ORCID identifier and accept the CRediT taxonomy. We encourage scientific societies to further authorship transparency by signing on to these recommendations and promoting them through their meetings and publications programs.

Keywords: authorship principles; research transparency; scientific integrity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: M. McNutt is president of the National Academy of Sciences, the publisher of PNAS. I.V. was Editor-in-chief of PNAS until January 1, 2018. V.K. serves as Chair of the ORCID Board of Directors in a volunteer capacity. Several authors' employers are ORCID member organizations.

Comment in

References

    1. Pennock RT. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research. Public Aff Q. 1996;10:379–393. - PubMed
    1. Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA. 1994;271:469–471. - PubMed
    1. Ghan S, et al. Author contributions can be clarified. J Geophys Res D Atmospheres. 2016;121:8155.
    1. Bošnjak L, Marušić A. Prescribed practices of authorship: Review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines. Scientometrics. 2012;93:751–763.
    1. Laurance WF. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists. Nature. 2006;442:26. - PubMed

Publication types