Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery
- PMID: 29487625
- PMCID: PMC5816863
- DOI: 10.1155/2018/6901764
Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the current study was to laparoscopically investigate the effects of peritoneal nonclosure on the sites, types, and degrees of adhesions developed after primary caesarean section (CS) in women complaining of secondary infertility after first CS delivery.
Study design: This was a cross-sectional study, where 250 women suffering from secondary infertility after their first CS had been recruited. They had been classified into group I (n = 89), where both the visceral and parietal peritoneum had been left opened; group II (n = 75), where only the parietal peritoneum had been closed; and group III (n = 86), where both peritoneal layers had been closed. Laparoscopy had been used to classify those adhesions according to the location, severity, and their adverse impact on the reproductive capacity.
Results: Both adnexal and nonadnexal adhesions had been found significantly higher in group I, while adnexal types of adhesions were significantly higher after nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum in group II. Laparoscopic tubal surgery performed included tubo-ovariolysis, fimbrioplasty, and neosalpingostomy. Pregnancy rate was found correlating with the adnexal adhesion location and score.
Conclusion: Nonclosure of the peritoneum in CS is associated with more adhesion formation, which might adversely affect the future women reproduction.
Similar articles
-
Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Jul 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 21924397 Clinical Trial.
-
Closure vs. nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Aug;94(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006. PMID: 16784747
-
Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):275-80. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171120.81732.4c. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16055575
-
Adhesion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: an explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers?Fertil Steril. 1998 Jan;69(1):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00429-9. Fertil Steril. 1998. PMID: 9457948 Review.
-
[Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Sep;37(5):463-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 May 20. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008. PMID: 18495379 Review. French.
References
-
- Menacker F., Hamilton B. E. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;35:1–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources