Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr;66(4):742-747.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15316. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

Economic Evaluation of a Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Program in Nursing Homes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Economic Evaluation of a Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Program in Nursing Homes

David W Hutton et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the economic effect and cost effectiveness of a targeted catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention intervention in the nursing home (NH) setting.

Design: Randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Community-based NHs (N=12).

Participants: NH residents with indwelling urinary catheters (N=418).

Intervention: Standard care versus infection prevention program involving barrier precautions, active surveillance, and NH staff education.

Measurements: Costs of the intervention, costs of disease, and health outcomes were used to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention. Data came from intervention results and the literature and outcomes were analyzed over one year.

Results: A 120-bed NH would have program costs of $20,279/year. The cost of disease treatment would be reduced by $54,316 per year, resulting in a $34,037 net cost savings. Most of this savings would come from fewer CAUTI hospitalizations ($39,180), with $15,136 in savings from CAUTI care within the NH. The intervention also yielded a gain of 0.197 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Taking into account uncertainty in all parameters suggests there is an 85% chance that the intervention is cost-saving.

Conclusions: The CAUTI prevention program is expected to benefit payers by reducing costs and improving health outcomes. Because the savings accrue to payers and not to NHs, payers such as Medicare and private insurers may want to provide incentives for NHs to implement such programs.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01062841.

Keywords: catheter-related infections; cost-effectiveness; drug resistance, multiple; nursing homes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of decision tree model. The figure should be read from left to right. The square represents the intervention decision. Circles represent uncertain outcomes for nursing home residents: whether they develop a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), whether they are hospitalized, and whether they have septicemia, given hospitalization.

Comment in

References

    1. Harris-Kojetin L, Sengupta M, Park-Lee E et al. Long-term care services in the United States: 2013 overview. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2013;3:1–107. - PubMed
    1. Montoya A, Mody L. Common infections in nursing homes: A review of current issues and challenges. Aging health 2011;7:889–899. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicolle LE. Catheter associated urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2015;3:23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mody L, Maheshwari S, Galecki A et al. Indwelling device use and antibiotic resistance in nursing homes: Identifying a high-risk group. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1921–1926. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rogers MA, Mody L, Kaufman S et al. Use of urinary collection devices in skilled nursing facilities in five states. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:854–861. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data