Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):234.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4138-7.

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in stage III colon cancer: a population-based study

Affiliations

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in stage III colon cancer: a population-based study

Peng Gao et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus regarding the optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for stage III colon cancer, and the relevant postoperative complications that cause delays in adjuvant chemotherapy are unknown.

Methods: Eligible patients aged ≥66 years who were diagnosed with stage III colon cancer from 1992 to 2008 were identified using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were utilized to evaluate the impact of the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 18,491 patients were included. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse OS (9-12 weeks: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.222, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.063-1.405; 13-16 weeks: HR = 1.252, 95% CI = 1.041-1.505; ≥ 17 weeks: HR = 1.969, 95% CI = 1.663-2.331). The efficacies of adjuvant chemotherapy within 5-8 weeks and ≤4 weeks were similar (HR = 1.045, 95% CI = 0.921-1.185). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, chemotherapy initiated at ≥21 weeks did not significantly improve OS (HR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.763-1.018). Patients with postoperative complications, particularly cardiac arrest, ostomy infection, shock, and septicemia, had a significantly higher risk of a 4- to 11-week delay in adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy initiated within 8 weeks was acceptable for patients with stage III colon cancer. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy after 8 weeks was significantly associated with worse OS. However, adjuvant chemotherapy might still be useful even with a delay of approximately 5 months. Moreover, postoperative complications were significantly associated with delayed adjuvant chemotherapy.

Keywords: Colon cancer; Postoperative complications; SEER-Medicare program; Stage III; Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Because the SEER-Medicare data are de-identified and are based on registry data, no prior informed consent was required. The access to the SEER-Medicare database was approved by the National Cancer Institute and Information Management Services, Inc. (D6-MEDIC-821), while this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Hospital of China Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Splines-based hazard ratio curve for identification of the effect of timing of chemotherapy on overall survival. The solid line presents the relationship (log hazard ratio) between timing of chemotherapy and overall survival, and the dotted line presents the corresponding 95% confidence limits
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curve of the timing of chemotherapy and overall survival. The p value is derived from log-rank test for the overall comparison of overall survival between different timing of chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hazard ratio plot for the relationship between timing of chemotherapy and overall survival compared with the non-chemotherapy group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier curve of chemotherapy regimen and overall survival. The p value is derived from log-rank test for the overall comparison of overall survival between different chemotherapy regimens and non-chemotherapy group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Hazard ratio plot for the relationship between timing of FOLFOX/CapeOX chemotherapy and overall survival compared with the non-chemotherapy group
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Association between postoperative complications and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after surgical resection. Orange color bars present the timing of AC among patients with postoperative complications. Blue color bars present the timing of AC among patients without postoperative complications. “**” present a significant difference with p value < 0.01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, Thome SD, Alberts SR, Haller DG, Benedetti J, Francini G, Shepherd LE, Francois Seitz J, et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22(10):1797–1806. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hensler T, Hecker H, Heeg K, Heidecke CD, Bartels H, Barthlen W, Wagner H, Siewert JR, Holzmann B. Distinct mechanisms of immunosuppression as a consequence of major surgery. Infect Immun. 1997;65(6):2283–2291. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baum M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W, Retsky M. Does surgery unfavourably perturb the "natural history" of early breast cancer by accelerating the appearance of distant metastases? European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2005;41(4):508–515. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.09.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher B, Gunduz N, Coyle J, Rudock C, Saffer E. Presence of a growth-stimulating factor in serum following primary tumor removal in mice. Cancer Res. 1989;49(8):1996–2001. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources