Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 10;131(19):2151-2160.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-805689. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent thrombosis after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism

Affiliations

Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent thrombosis after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism

Clive Kearon et al. Blood. .

Abstract

It is uncertain whether antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) increase the risk of recurrence after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). We tested for anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein 1 antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant on 2 occasions ∼6 months apart in 307 patients with a first unprovoked VTE who were part of a prospective cohort study. We then determined if APAs were associated with recurrent thrombosis in the 290 patients who stopped anticoagulant therapy in response to negative D-dimer results. Compared with those without an APA, the hazard ratios for recurrent VTE were 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-3.7; P = .09) in the 25.9% of patients with an APA on ≥1 occasions, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.1-.7; P = .03) in the 9.0% of patients with the same APA on 2 occasions, and 4.5 (95% CI, 1.5-13.0; P = .006) in the 3.8% of patients with 2 or 3 different APA types on either the same or different occasions. There was no association between having an APA and D-dimer levels. We conclude that having the same type of APA on 2 occasions or having >1 type of APA on the same or different occasions is associated with recurrent thrombosis in patients with a first unprovoked VTE who stop anticoagulant therapy in response to negative D-dimer tests. APA and D-dimer levels seem to be independent predictors of recurrence in patients with an unprovoked VTE. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00720915.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flow and when APA testing was performed. At enrollment, all patients were receiving anticoagulants. At 1 month, patients with a positive D-dimer at enrollment remained on anticoagulants. At 7 months, patients with a positive D-dimer at enrollment or 1 month were receiving anticoagulants, and patients with a negative D-dimer at enrollment and at 1 month were not receiving anticoagulants.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association between quantitative APA assay results and recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulant therapy. Results of APA assays in individual patients according to whether they did or did not have recurrent VTE during follow-up after stopping anticoagulant therapy. The cutoff values used to define whether a result was within the normal range are shown for each type of APA assay. When an APA was measured on 2 occasions in the same patient, the higher of the 2 values was used in these figures. The median values in patients with and without recurrent VTE are shown; the P values (2-sided median test) associated with each of these differences were: ACA IgG, P = .15; ACA IgM, P = .041; anti-β2GP1, P = .70; LA APTT, P = .17; and LA dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT), P = .70. GPL, IgG phospholipid units; MPL, IgM phospholipid units.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulant therapy in patients with different APA findings. The cumulative proportion for recurrent VTE during follow-up after stopping anticoagulant therapy according to the APA findings in different groups of patients. No APA means no positive APA test on all occasions tested, and any APA means ≥1 positive APA tests on ≥1 occasions; these 2 groups are mutually exclusive. Same APA means that the same type of APA was positive on 2 occasions; these patients are a subgroup of the any APA group. Different APA means that at least 2 different types of APAs were positive, either on the same or different occasions; these patients are a subgroup of the any APA group.

Comment in

References

    1. Giannakopoulos B, Krilis SA. The pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):1033-1044. - PubMed
    1. Garcia D, Akl EA, Carr R, Kearon C. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the risk of recurrence after a first episode of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Blood. 2013;122(5):817-824. - PubMed
    1. Cohen D, Berger SP, Steup-Beekman GM, Bloemenkamp KW, Bajema IM. Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome. BMJ. 2010;340:c2541. - PubMed
    1. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Crowther M, Branch W, Khamashta MA. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Lancet. 2010;376(9751):1498-1509. - PubMed
    1. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295-306. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Grants and funding