Examination of short and long term complications of thermocautery, plastic clamping, and surgical circumcision techniques
- PMID: 29492070
- PMCID: PMC5768836
- DOI: 10.12669/pjms.336.13640
Examination of short and long term complications of thermocautery, plastic clamping, and surgical circumcision techniques
Abstract
Objective: In this study, thermocautery, plastic clamping, and conventional (open surgical) circumcision techniques were compared in terms of their complications.
Methods: Male patients who underwent circumcisions between May 2014 and May 2015 in two separate pediatric surgery clinics were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital registry system. These patients were evaluated in terms of age, accompanying pathologies, anesthesia techniques, complication rates, duration of surgery, and circumcision techniques. A statistical analysis of the data was performed, with a P<0.05 considered to be statistically significant.
Results: The patients were divided into three groups according to the circumcision method: conventional surgical circumcision (n=833), thermocautery (n=1011), and plastic clamp (n=218). Complications were observed in 21 cases (1%): bleeding (11), infection (2), trapped penis (6), meatitis (1), and scrotal injury (1). There were significantly fewer complications in the thermocautery technique when compared to the clamping and surgical circumcision techniques. The plastic clamping and thermocautery techniques were superior to a surgical circumcision in terms of the operation time.
Conclusion: The thermocautery circumcision technique can be used easily in both the operating theatre and in designated circumcision rooms, with a lower complication rate, when compared to plastic clamping and surgical circumcisions.
Keywords: Circumcision; Clamp; Complication; Pediatric; Thermocautery.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Thermal cautery-assisted circumcision and principles of its use to decrease complication rates.J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Apr;15(2):186.e1-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 19. J Pediatr Urol. 2019. PMID: 30770302
-
Is it safe to use a thermocautery device for circumcision? Examination of the histopathological changes emerging after thermocautery-assisted circumcisions.Andrologia. 2021 Apr;53(3):e13968. doi: 10.1111/and.13968. Epub 2021 Jan 9. Andrologia. 2021. PMID: 33421180
-
Incidence of Complications Following Thermocautery-assisted Circumcisions.Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):359-364. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4296. Urol J. 2018. PMID: 29616499
-
The ShangRing device for simplified adult circumcision.Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Nov;7(11):638-42. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.167. Epub 2010 Oct 12. Nat Rev Urol. 2010. PMID: 20938437 Review.
-
Neonatal circumcision.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;48(6):1539-57. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70390-4. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11732129 Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision: retrospective analysis of circumcision performed voluntarily in countries of low socioeconomic status.Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Oct 13;11:1756287219882598. doi: 10.1177/1756287219882598. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2019. PMID: 31662793 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and early complications of conventional circumcision techniques and thermocautery-assisted circumcision.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 28;15(1):7139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91730-5. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40021714 Free PMC article.
-
Need for Increased Awareness of International Male Circumcision Variations and Associated Complications: A Contemporary Review.Cureus. 2022 Apr 26;14(4):e24507. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24507. eCollection 2022 Apr. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35651438 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Male Circumcision Utilising an Ultrasonic Dissection Scalpel in an Adult.Cureus. 2025 Feb 19;17(2):e79273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79273. eCollection 2025 Feb. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 39974300 Free PMC article.
-
Parental traditional medicine use for children and associated factors in Harar City, Harari Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study.Front Pediatr. 2025 Jun 9;13:1546455. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1546455. eCollection 2025. Front Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40551777 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kabila SBS, Sandy IF, Daniel M, Atuyambe LM, Makumbi FE. A comparison of sexual risk behaviours and HIV seroprevalence among circumcised and uncircumcised men before and after implementation of the safe male circumcision programme in Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:7. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2668-3. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Barone MA, Ndede F, Li PS, Masson P, Awori Q, Okech J, et al. The Shang Ring device for adult male circumcision:a proof of concept study in Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57:7–12. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182158967. - PubMed
-
- Buyukunal SNC. Circumcision and its historical and social aspects in Turkey. J Turkish Ass of Pediatr Surgeons. 2015;29:104–120. doi:10.5222/JTAPS.2015.104.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources