Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov-Dec;33(6):1525-1527.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.336.13721.

Micro-Feedback Training:Learning the art of effective feedback

Affiliations

Micro-Feedback Training:Learning the art of effective feedback

Najma Baseer et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Multiple attributes are expected of postgraduate research supervisors. Provision of timely and effective face-to-face feedback is one such skill that carries enormous significance in supervisee's professional development. Feedback allows the supervisees to improve upon their performances. Unfortunately, both supervisors and supervisees have contrasting approaches towards the ongoing feedback practices. This incongruence is attributed, in part, to a lack of structured pedagogic training among the medical professionals. A standardized schema is therefore required to acquire and harmonize this pedagogical skill. One such systemized way is a training method called microteaching. Microteaching has long been used to enhance and incorporate old and new undergraduate teaching skills, respectively. Here we propose a similar structured approach of micro-feedback to inculcate effective feedback skills among postgraduate research supervisors using feedback-based scenarios, simulated students, standardized checklists and audiovisual aids. Thus, micro-feedback exercise may prove to be quite promising in improving feedback practices of postgraduate research supervisors.

Keywords: Feedback; Microteaching; Postgraduate; Research Faculty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose in relation to this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cleary ML, Walter G. Giving feedback to learners in clinical and academic settings:Practical considerations. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010;41(4):153–154. doi:10.3928/00220124-20100326-10. - PubMed
    1. Handley K, Donovan BO, Price M, Handley K, Millar J, Donovan BO. Feedback:All that effort, but what is the effect ? Assess Eval High Educ. 2010;35(3):277–289. doi:10.1080/02602930903541007.
    1. Juwah C, Macfarlane-Dick D, Matthew B, Nicol D, Ross D, Smith B. Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback [Internet] The Higher Education Academy. 2004. Available from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/resource_database/id353_effe... .
    1. Poertner S, Miller KM. In: The art of giving and receiving feedback First. Miller KM, editor. Virginia: Coastal Training Technologies Corp; 1996. p. 101.
    1. Hassan BA. The Effects of Microteaching Supervisory Feedback on EFL Student Teacher Performance. Proceedings of the 15th National Symposium on English Language Teaching in Egypt Cairo:CDELT, Ain Shams University. 1996:1–17.

LinkOut - more resources