Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;27(6):1365-1374.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5533-0. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

Comparable clinical and radiological outcomes between skipped-level and all-level plating for open-door laminoplasty

Affiliations

Comparable clinical and radiological outcomes between skipped-level and all-level plating for open-door laminoplasty

Jason Pui Yin Cheung et al. Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between skipped-level and all-level plating for cervical laminoplasty.

Methods: Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) treated by open-door laminoplasty with minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up were included. All patients had opening from C3-6 or C3-7 and were divided into skipped-level or all-level plating groups. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and canal measurements were obtained preoperatively, immediate (within 1 week) postoperatively, and at 2, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Paired t test was used for comparative analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the canal expansion cutoff for spring-back closure.

Results: A total of 74 subjects were included with mean age of 66.1 ± 11.3 years at surgery. Of these, 32 underwent skipped-level plating and 42 underwent all-level plating. No significant differences were noted between the two groups at baseline and follow-up. Spring-back closure was observed in up to 50% of the non-plated levels within 3 months postoperatively. The cutoff for developing spring-back closure was 7 mm canal expansion for C3-6. No differences were observed in JOA scores and recovery rates between the two groups. None of the patients with spring-back required reoperation.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences between skipped-level and all-level plating in terms of JOA or recovery rate, and canal diameter differences. This has tremendous impact on saving costs in CSM management as up to two plates per patient undergoing a standard C3-6 laminoplasty may be omitted instead of four plates to every level to achieve similar clinical and radiological outcomes.

Level of evidence: III. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Keywords: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Laminoplasty; Plates; Skipped-level; Spring-back.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E10 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jan 1;36(1):9-14 - PubMed
    1. J Spinal Disord. 1999 Oct;12 (5):386-91 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jun 15;26(12 ):1330-6 - PubMed
    1. Orthopedics. 2012 Apr;35(4):e543-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources