Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory
- PMID: 29492785
- DOI: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3
Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory
Abstract
This article describes an approach for training a variety of species to learn the abstract concept of same/different, which in turn forms the basis for testing proactive interference and list memory. The stimulus set for concept-learning training was progressively doubled from 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 . . . to 1,024 different pictures with novel-stimulus transfer following learning. All species fully learned the same/different abstract concept: capuchin and rhesus monkeys learned more readily than pigeons; nutcrackers and magpies were at least equivalent to monkeys and transferred somewhat better following initial training sets. A similar task using the 1,024-picture set plus delays was used to test proactive interference on occasional trials. Pigeons revealed greater interference with 10-s than with 1-s delays, whereas delay time had no effect on rhesus monkeys, suggesting that the monkeys' interference was event based. This same single-item same/different task was expanded to a 4-item list memory task to test animal list memory. Humans were tested similarly with lists of kaleidoscope pictures. Delays between the list and test were manipulated, resulting in strong initial recency effects (i.e., strong 4th-item memory) at short delays and changing to a strong primacy effect (i.e., strong 1st-item memory) at long delays (pigeons 0-s to 10-s delays; monkeys 0-s to 30-s delays; humans 0-s to 100-s delays). Results and findings are discussed in terms of these species' cognition and memory comparisons, evolutionary implications, and future directions for testing other species in these synergistically related tasks.
Keywords: Avians; Corvids; List Memory; Nonhuman Primates; Proactive Interference; Same/Different Abstract-Concept Learning.
Similar articles
-
Testing complex animal cognition: Concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Jan;109(1):87-100. doi: 10.1002/jeab.299. Epub 2018 Jan 2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018. PMID: 29293262
-
Same/different concept learning by primates and birds.Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):76-84. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00456-z. Epub 2021 Mar 9. Learn Behav. 2021. PMID: 33742425
-
Corvids Outperform Pigeons and Primates in Learning a Basic Concept.Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):437-444. doi: 10.1177/0956797616685871. Epub 2017 Feb 1. Psychol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28151701
-
The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.Learn Behav. 2018 Sep;46(3):229-241. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0321-6. Learn Behav. 2018. PMID: 29532328 Review.
-
Performance on traditional matching to sample, non-matching to sample, and object discrimination tasks by 12- to 32-month-old children. A developmental progression.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;608:365-85; discussion 385-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48903.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990. PMID: 2127513 Review.
Cited by
-
Active Confirmation Bias in the Evaluative Processing of Food Images.Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 15;8(1):16864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35179-9. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30443034 Free PMC article.
-
Visual Discrimination Task in Guppies Using a Simultaneous Matching-to-Sample Procedure.Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1936. doi: 10.3390/ani15131936. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40646836 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for a general cognitive structure in pigeons (Columba livia).Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 2;27(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01912-3. Anim Cogn. 2024. PMID: 39488653 Free PMC article.
-
The Comparative Psychology of Intelligence: Some Thirty Years Later.Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00973. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32508723 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources