Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jun;21(8):1426-1434.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000319. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Traffic-light labels and financial incentives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage purchases by low-income Latino families: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Traffic-light labels and financial incentives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage purchases by low-income Latino families: a randomized controlled trial

Rebecca L Franckle et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study was to test the effectiveness of financial incentives and traffic-light labels to reduce purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages in a community supermarket.

Design: In this randomized controlled trial, after a 2-month baseline period (February-March 2014), in-store traffic-light labels were posted to indicate healthy (green), less healthy (yellow) or unhealthy (red) beverages. During the subsequent five months (April-August 2014), participants in the intervention arm were eligible to earn a $US 25 in-store gift card each month they refrained from purchasing red-labelled beverages.

Setting: Urban supermarket in Chelsea, MA, USA, a low-income Latino community.

Subjects: Participants were customers of this supermarket who had at least one child living at home. A total of 148 customers (n 77 in the intervention group and n 71 in the control group) were included in the final analyses.

Results: Outcomes were monthly in-store purchases tracked using a store loyalty card and self-reported consumption of red-labelled beverages. Compared with control participants, the proportion of intervention participants who purchased any red-labelled beverages decreased by 9 % more per month (P=0·002). More intervention than control participants reduced their consumption of red-labelled beverages (-23 % v. -2 % for consuming ≥1 red beverage/week, P=0·01).

Conclusions: Overall, financial incentives paired with in-store traffic-light labels modestly reduced purchase and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by customers of a community supermarket.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01990508.

Keywords: Financial incentives; Sugar-sweetened beverages; Supermarket traffic-light labels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flow diagram of participants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of traffic-light labels and financial incentives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage purchases by low-income families at a community supermarket, Chelsea, MA, USA (April–August 2014)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of the intervention group (formula image) who purchased any red beverages decreased by 9 % more per month compared with the control group (formula image) among participants (n 148) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of traffic-light labels and financial incentives to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage purchases by low-income families at a community supermarket, Chelsea, MA, USA (April–August 2014). P=0·002 for difference in trends over time in proportion of participants who purchased any red beverages

References

    1. Malik V, Popkin B, Bray G et al.. (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation 121, 1356–1364. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Get the facts: sugar-sweetened beverages and consumption. http://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/data-statistics/sugar-sweetened-beverages-i... (accessed June 2017).
    1. Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, The Nutrition Source (2015) Sugary drinks. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-drinks/sugary-drinks/ (accessed June 2017).
    1. Park S (2016) Prevalence of sugar-sweetened beverage intake among adults – 23 states and the District of Columbia, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65, 169–174. - PubMed
    1. Miller G (2017) Trends in beverage consumption among high school students – United States, 2007–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66, 112–116. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data