Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Book

Ranson Criteria

In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Book

Ranson Criteria

Hajira Basit et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The original Ranson criteria is a scoring system that uses 11 parameters to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis. The 11 parameters are age, white blood cell count (WBC), blood glucose, serum aspartate transaminase (AST), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum calcium, fall in hematocrit, arterial oxygen (PaO2), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), base deficit, and sequestration of fluids.

The criteria are named after Dr. John Ranson, a surgeon and leading figure on the pancreas during the 20th century. Dr. Ranson introduced the criteria in his 1974 paper, Prognostic Signs and the Role of Operative Management in Acute Pancreatitis. The study had a population of 100 patients with acute pancreatitis. Eleven objective findings were determined to be of significant prognostic value for predicting severe acute pancreatitis. These objective findings are the 11 abovementioned parameters that comprise the Ranson criteria. It should be noted that there is also a modified Ranson criterion. The criteria with 11 parameters are used to score alcoholic pancreatitis, while the modified criteria have 10 parameters used to score gallbladder pancreatitis.

Ranson criteria are one of the earliest scoring systems to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis and continue to be widely used. Since its inception, at least 17 other scoring systems have been validated. The most widely used clinical prognostic scores include the Ranson criteria, Glasgow prognostic criteria, the APACHE II classification system, and the Balthazar CT-enhanced scoring system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Hajira Basit declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Gordon Ruan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Sandeep Mukherjee declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

References

    1. Kothari S, Kalinowski M, Kobeszko M, Almouradi T. Computed tomography scan imaging in diagnosing acute uncomplicated pancreatitis: Usefulness vs cost. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 07;25(9):1080-1087. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yılmaz EM, Kandemir A. Significance of red blood cell distribution width and C-reactive protein/albumin levels in predicting prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Nov;24(6):528-531. - PubMed
    1. Waller A, Long B, Koyfman A, Gottlieb M. Acute Pancreatitis: Updates for Emergency Clinicians. J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;55(6):769-779. - PubMed
    1. Hagjer S, Kumar N. Evaluation of the BISAP scoring system in prognostication of acute pancreatitis - A prospective observational study. Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):76-81. - PubMed
    1. Shah AS, Gupta AK, Ded KS. Assessment of PANC3 Score in Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis. Niger J Surg. 2017 Jan-Jun;23(1):53-57. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources