Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 24;10(2):257.
doi: 10.3390/nu10020257.

Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in the Packaged Food Supply-An Assessment across 4 Countries

Affiliations

Non-Nutritive Sweeteners in the Packaged Food Supply-An Assessment across 4 Countries

Elizabeth K Dunford et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Increased interest among consumers in the reduction of dietary sugar intake has led to the wider availability of food products containing non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). However, the extent to which NNS are currently being used by manufacturers to sweeten processed food and beverage products, and how NNS may be displacing added sugars as a sweetener is unknown. The current study utilized branded food composition databases from Australia, Mexico, New Zealand and the US to determine the percentage of processed food and beverage products for which there are nutrition data containing NNS and to compare total sugar density (g per 100 mL for beverages and g per 100 g for foods) between products with and without NNS. Ordinary least squares regression at the country-product level was performed to examine associations between presence of NNS and total sugar. Across all countries, 5% of products contained at least one NNS, with the highest prevalence among beverages (22%). Mexico had the highest percentage of products with NNS (11%), as compared to the United States (US) (4%), New Zealand (1%), and Australia (<1%). The presence of NNS was associated with lower mean total sugar density among beverages (range across countries: 7.5 to 8.7 g per 100 mL) and among foods (23.2 to 25.5 g per 100 g). Products with both added sugar ingredients and NNS had a lower overall mean total sugar density when compared to products containing only added sugar ingredients. Due to paucity of data on sales and market shares across these countries, our results do not reflect the extent to which consumers purchase NNS containing products. Continued monitoring of NNS in the food supply, extension of work from these data, and inclusion of market shares of products will be important as more countries introduce policies to reduce sugar.

Keywords: Australia; Mexico; New Zealand; United States; beverages; non-nutritive sweeteners; processed foods; sugars.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bray G.A., Popkin B.M. Dietary sugar and body weight: Have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes? Health be damned! Pour on the sugar. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:950–956. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2085. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu F.B. Resolved: There is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obes. Rev. 2013;14:606–619. doi: 10.1111/obr.12040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanigorski A.M., Bell A.C., Swinburn B.A. Association of key foods and beverages with obesity in Australian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:152–157. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007246634. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poti J.M., Mendez M.A., Ng S.W., Popkin B.M. Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015;101:1251–1262. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barquera S., Campos I., Rivera J.A. Mexico attempts to tackle obesity: The process, results, push backs and future challenges. Obes. Rev. 2013;14:69–78. doi: 10.1111/obr.12096. - DOI - PubMed