Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 24;19(2):638.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19020638.

Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE3 (RTNLB3) and RTNLB8 Participate in Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation

Affiliations

Arabidopsis RETICULON-LIKE3 (RTNLB3) and RTNLB8 Participate in Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation

Fan-Chen Huang et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Agrobacterium tumefaciens can genetically transform various eukaryotic cells because of the presence of a resident tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid. During infection, a defined region of the Ti plasmid, transfer DNA (T-DNA), is transferred from bacteria into plant cells and causes plant cells to abnormally synthesize auxin and cytokinin, which results in crown gall disease. T-DNA and several virulence (Vir) proteins are secreted through a type IV secretion system (T4SS) composed of T-pilus and a transmembrane protein complex. Three members of Arabidopsis reticulon-like B (RTNLB) proteins, RTNLB1, 2, and 4, interact with VirB2, the major component of T-pilus. Here, we have identified that other RTNLB proteins, RTNLB3 and 8, interact with VirB2 in vitro. Root-based A. tumefaciens transformation assays with Arabidopsis rtnlb3, or rtnlb5-10 single mutants showed that the rtnlb8 mutant was resistant to A. tumefaciens infection. In addition, rtnlb3 and rtnlb8 mutants showed reduced transient transformation efficiency in seedlings. RTNLB3- or 8 overexpression transgenic plants showed increased susceptibility to A. tumefaciens and Pseudomonas syringae infection. RTNLB1-4 and 8 transcript levels differed in roots, rosette leaves, cauline leaves, inflorescence, flowers, and siliques of wild-type plants. Taken together, RTNLB3 and 8 may participate in A. tumefaciens infection but may have different roles in plants.

Keywords: Agrobacterium; RTNLB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
RTNLB8, not 3, and 5–7 proteins, interacted with the processed VirB2 in yeast. RTNLB1-8 proteins were tested for interactions with VirB2 or the RTNLB1-8 using a yeast two-hybrid assay. The RTNLB5-7 proteins showed no interactions with RTNLB1-8 proteins in yeast. The unrelated Lamin C bait protein was the negative control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The GST-VirB2 fusion protein interacted with RTNLB1-4 and 8 proteins in vitro. The GST-fusion and GST only proteins were linked with glutathione-sepharose beads and incubated with T7-tagged proteins to test their interactions in vitro. Bound proteins were eluted with glutathione and analyzed by protein gel blot using anti-T7 tag and anti-GST antibodies. Panel A, interactions between VirB2 and RTNLB1-4 and 8 were determined by using the GST-VirB2 fusion protein and T7-tagged-RTNLB1-4 and 8 or the GST-fusion of RTNLB1-4 and 8 and the T7-tagged-VirB2 protein. Panel B, the GST-only protein was used as a negative control in GST pull-down assays. The GST fusions of RTNLB1 (Panel C), RTNLB2 (Panel D), RTNLB3 (Panel E), RTNLB4 (Panel F), and RTNLB8 (Panel G) were used to investigate their interactions with T7-tagged-RTNLB1-4 and 8 proteins.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Arabidopsis rtnlb3 and rtnlb8 T-DNA insertion mutant seedlings were resistant to A. tumefaciens infection. Panel A, schematic representations of the T-DNA insertion regions around the Arabidopsis RTNLB3 (Panel A-1), RTNLB5 (Panel A-2), RTNLB6 (Panel A-3), RTNLB7 (Panel A-4), RTNLB8 (Panel A-5), RTNLB9 (Panel A-6), and RTNLB10 (Panel A-7) genes. Blue boxes represented exon regions of each RTNLB gene. The large open triangle represents T-DNA insertion sites in each RTNLB gene. The long and short arrows indicate the locations of primers used in genomic DNA PCR analysis. Panel B, RT-PCR results of target RTNLB transcripts in rtnlb3 and rtnlb5-10 single mutants. The α-tubulin was an internal control. Panel C, transcript levels of each RTNLB gene in rtnlb single mutants shown as a relative percentage of wild-type plants. Data are mean ± SE from at least 3 RT-PCR reactions of each mutant. Panel D, transformation efficiencies of rtnlb8-1 and rtnlb8-2 and wild-type plants. Black bars indicate the percentage of root segments forming tumors 1 month after infection with 108 cfu·mL−1 tumorigenic A. tumefaciens A208 strain. Grey bars show the percentage of root segments with GUS activity 6 days after infection with 108 cfu·mL−1 A. tumefaciens At849 strain. Panel E, rtnlb3 and rtnlb8 mutant seedlings showed decreased susceptibility to transient transformation. Transient transformation efficiency in mutant seedlings infected with 107 cfu·mL−1 acetosyringone (AS)-induced A. tumefaciens strain for 3 days. Data are mean ± SE. * p < 0.05 compared with the wild-type by pairwise Student’s t test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
RTNLB3 and RTNLB8 overexpression (O/E) transgenic plants were hypersusceptible to A. tumefaciens infections. Panel A, RT-PCR analysis of RTNLB transcript levels in RTNLB3 (Panel A-1) and RTNLB8 (Panel A-2) O/E plants and the wild type. The α-tubulin was used as an internal control. Panel B, transcript levels of RTNLB3 (Panel B-1) or RTNLB8 (Panel B-2) in O/E plants relative to wild-type expression. Data are mean ± SE from at least 3 RT-PCR reactions of each mutant. Panel C, the T7-tagged-RTNLB3 (Panel C-1) and RTNLB8 (Panel C-2) O/E plants accumulated T7-tagged RTNLB proteins. Ponceau S (PS) staining was used to show equivalent loading of total protein in each lane. Panel D, Transient transformation efficiency of RTNLB3 and 8 O/E and wild-type plants. Green bars represent the percentage of root segments developing tumors after infection with 108, 106, or 105 cfu·mL−1 of A. tumefaciens A208. Blue bars indicate the percentage of root segments with GUS activity after infection with 108, 106, or 105 cfu·mL−1 of A. tumefaciens At849 strain. The 108 cfu mL−1 of A. tumefaciens was used to infect wild-type roots as a positive control to indicate successful transformation. Panel E, Enhanced transient transformation efficiency in seedlings of RTNLB3 and 8 O/E plants. Seedlings of O/E plants were infected with 105 cfu·mL−1 of AS-induced A. tumefaciens strain. Wild-type seedlings were infected with 107 cfu·mL−1 of A. tumefaciens strain as a positive control. Data are mean ± SE. * p < 0.05 compared with the wild-type by pairwise Student’s t test.
Figure 5
Figure 5
RTNLB3 and 8 O/E plants were more sensitive to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) infection. Panel A, leaves of wild-type and RTNLB O/E plants were syringe-infiltrated with Pst DC3000 (Panel A-1) and hrcC mutant (Panel A-2). Bacterial numbers in infected leaves were quantified at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days post-infection. Data are mean ± SE. * p < 0.05 compared with the wild-type by pairwise Student’s t test. Panel B, disease symptoms of wild-type and RTNLB O/E plant leaves 5 days after infection with Pst DC3000 or hrcC mutant. Panel C, trypan blue staining of infected leaves of wild-type and RTNLB O/E plants 5 days after infection with Pst DC3000. Yellow bar = 1 cm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Levels of RTNLB1-4 and 8 in various tissues of wild-type Arabidopsis (ecotype: Columbia) plants. RNA from root, rosette leaf, cauline leaf, inflorescence, flower, and silique of wild-type plants were isolated, reverse-transcribed, and used for quantitative real-time PCR. UBQ10 (polyubiquitin 10) transcript level was an internal control. Data are mean ± SE.

References

    1. Gelvin S.B. Plant proteins involved in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010;48:45–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081852. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gelvin S.B. Traversing the cell: Agrobacterium T-DNA’s journey to the host genome. Front. Plant Sci. 2012;3:52. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lacroix B., Citovsky V. The roles of bacterial and host plant factors in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013;57:467–481. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.130199bl. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pitzschke A. Infection and plant defense-transformation success hangs by a thread. Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4:519. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00519. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gohlke J., Deeken R. Plant responses to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and crown gall development. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5:155. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00155. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms