Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb 26;5(1):23.
doi: 10.3390/medicines5010023.

How Nanotechnology and Biomedical Engineering Are Supporting the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers in Neuro-Oncology

Affiliations
Review

How Nanotechnology and Biomedical Engineering Are Supporting the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers in Neuro-Oncology

Mario Ganau et al. Medicines (Basel). .

Abstract

The field of neuro-oncology is rapidly progressing and internalizing many of the recent discoveries coming from research conducted in basic science laboratories worldwide. This systematic review aims to summarize the impact of nanotechnology and biomedical engineering in defining clinically meaningful predictive biomarkers with a potential application in the management of patients with brain tumors. Data were collected through a review of the existing English literature performed on Scopus, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE, and/or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials: all available basic science and clinical papers relevant to address the above-stated research question were included and analyzed in this study. Based on the results of this systematic review we can conclude that: (1) the advances in nanotechnology and bioengineering are supporting tremendous efforts in optimizing the methods for genomic, epigenomic and proteomic profiling; (2) a successful translational approach is attempting to identify a growing number of biomarkers, some of which appear to be promising candidates in many areas of neuro-oncology; (3) the designing of Randomized Controlled Trials will be warranted to better define the prognostic value of those biomarkers and biosignatures.

Keywords: biomarkers; innovation; neurosurgery; oncology; precision medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection process of suitable articles to be analyzed in this systematic review.

References

    1. Prentice R.L. Surrogate and mediating endpoints: Current status and future directions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009;101:216–217. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001;69:89–95. - PubMed
    1. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group . BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and Other Tools) Resource. Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring, MD, USA: 2016. - PubMed
    1. Chau C.H., Rixe O., McLeod H., Figg W.D. Validation of analytic methods for biomarkers used in drug development. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:5967–5976. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4535. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yates L.R., Seoane J., Le Tourneau C., Siu L.L., Marais R., Michiels S., Soria J.C., Campbell P., Normanno N., Scarpa A., et al. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Glossary. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:30–35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx707. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources