Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;27(2):136-143.
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018598.

Association Between Enteral Feeding, Weight Status, and Mortality in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

Affiliations

Association Between Enteral Feeding, Weight Status, and Mortality in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

Michael T Vest et al. Am J Crit Care. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend enteral nutrition for most patients receiving mechanical ventilation. However, recently published evidence on the effect of enteral nutrition on mortality, particularly for patients who are well nourished, is conflicting.

Objectives: To examine the association between enteral feeding and hospital mortality in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation and to determine if body mass index mediates this relationship.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients receiving mechanical ventilation admitted to a medical intensive care unit in 2013. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the relationship between an enteral feeding order and hospital mortality and to determine if the relationship was mediated by body mass index.

Results: Of 777 patients who had 811 hospitalizations requiring mechanical ventilation, 182 (23.4%) died in the hospital. A total of 478 patients (61.5%) received an order for enteral tube feeding, which was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.59). Body mass index did not mediate the relationship between mortality and receipt of an order for enteral feeding. Median stay in the unit was 3.6 days. Most deaths (72.0%) occurred more than 48 hours after admission.

Conclusion: The finding of a positive association between an order for enteral feeding and survival supports enteral feeding of patients in medical intensive care units. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of enteral feeding appears to apply to patients regardless of body mass index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram shows reasons for exclusion from analytical data set. Abbreviations: Fio2, fraction of inspired oxygen; ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curves for patients with an order for enteral nutrition versus no order for enteral nutrition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival curves for patients with an order for enteral nutrition versus no order for enteral nutrition excluding patients who stayed in the intensive care unit for less than 24 hours.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seres DS, Valcarcel M, Guillaume A. Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013;6(2):157–167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McClave SA,Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al.; Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(2):159–211. - PubMed
    1. Wilmore DW, Smith RJ, O’Dwyer ST, Jacobs DO, Ziegler TR, Wang XD.The gut: a central organ after surgical stress. Surgery. 1988;104(5):917–923. - PubMed
    1. Casaer MP, Van den Berghe G. Nutrition in the acute phase of critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1227–36. - PubMed
    1. Khalid I, Doshi P, DiGiovine B. Early enteral nutrition and outcomes of critically ill patients treated with vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care. 2010;19(3):261–268. - PubMed

Publication types