Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan:79:469-476.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.11.010.

Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat?

Peter R Shewry  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat?

Peter R Shewry. J Cereal Sci. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

A number of studies have suggested that ancient wheats have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat. However, the mechanisms are unclear and limited numbers of genotypes have been studied, with a particular focus on Kamut® (Khorasan wheat). This is important because published analyses have shown wide variation in composition between genotypes, with further effects of growth conditions. The present article therefore critically reviews published comparisons of the health benefits of ancient and modern wheats, in relation to the selection and growth of the lines, including dietary interventions and comparisons of adverse effects (allergy, intolerance, sensitivity). It is concluded that further studies are urgently required, particularly from a wider range of research groups, but also on a wider range of genotypes of ancient and modern wheat species. Furthermore, although most published studies have made efforts to ensure the comparability of material in terms of growth conditions and processing, it is essential that these are standardised in future studies and this should perhaps be a condition of publication.

Keywords: Allergy; Ancient wheat; Health benefits; Intolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abdel-Aal E.-S.M., Sosulski F.W., Hucl P. Origins, characteristics and potentials of ancient wheats. Cereal Foods World. 1998;43:708–715.
    1. Bodroza-Solarov M., Vujic D., Acanski M., Pezo L., Filipcev B., Mladenov N. Characterisation of the liposoluble fraction of common wheat (Triticum aestivum) and spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta) flours using multivariate analysis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014;94:2613–2617. - PubMed
    1. Benedetti S., Primaterra M., Tagliamonte M.C., Carnevali A., Gianottic A., Bordoni A., Canestrari F. Counteraction of oxidative damage in the rat liver by ancient grain (Kamut brand Khorasan wheat) Nutrition. 2012;28:436–441. - PubMed
    1. Bordoni A., Danesi F., Di Nunzio M., Taccar A., Valli V. Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality: a review on KAMUT Khorasan wheat. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;68:278–286. - PubMed
    1. Brenneisen P., Steinbrenner H., Sies H. Selenium, oxidative stress, and health aspects. Mol. Aspect. Med. 2005;26:256–267. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources