Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan-Feb;15(1):63-70.
doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.223610.

Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments

Affiliations

Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments

Farhad Shafiei et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess and compare the shear bond strength of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cement to nickel-chromium-cobalt alloy with different surface treatments.

Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, a total of 120 disks were fabricated of VeraBond II base metal alloy. Specimens were divided into 15 groups of 8 based on the type of cement and surface treatment. The five surface treatments studied included sandblasting alone, application of Alloy Primer with and without sandblasting, and application of Metal Primer II with and without sandblasting. The three cement tested included Panavia F2.0, RelyX Unicem (RU), and G-Cem (GC). After receiving the respective surface treatments, the specimens were thermocycled for 1500 cycles and underwent shear bond strength testing. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 and three-way analysis of variance. P values of the significant level of 0.05 were reported.

Results: The results exhibited that the mean bond strengths in sandblasted groups were higher than nonsandblasted one. These differences were significantly higher in the sandblasted groups of Panavia F2.0 and RU cement (P < 0.05). The mean bond strength values between GC and Panavia F2.0 were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The highest bond strength was recorded for Panavia F2.0 with the surface treatment of both sandblasting and Metal Primer II.

Conclusion: Based on the results, sandblasting improves the shear bond strength of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys. The best results can be achieved with a combination of sandblasting and metal primers. The performance of resin cement depends on to their chemical composition, not to the type of system.

Keywords: Dental alloys; bond strength; resin cement; self-adhesive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar chart of the effect of cement type and surface treatment on the shear bond strength of resin adhesive cement to base metal alloy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of surface treatment procedures on the shear bond strength of base metal alloy to three different resin adhesive cement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative examples of mode of failure observed using stereomicroscope. (a) Mixed failure, (b) adhesive failure.

References

    1. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45–64. - PubMed
    1. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:135–41. - PubMed
    1. Stamatacos C, Simon JF. Cementation of indirect restorations: An overview of resin cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34:42–4, 46. - PubMed
    1. Simon JF, Darnell LA. Considerations for proper selection of dental cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33:28. - PubMed
    1. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: A literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:251–8. - PubMed