Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 15;54(23):2902-2905.
doi: 10.1039/c8cc00112j.

Giant exchange coupling and field-induced slow relaxation of magnetization in Gd2@C79N with a single-electron Gd-Gd bond

Affiliations

Giant exchange coupling and field-induced slow relaxation of magnetization in Gd2@C79N with a single-electron Gd-Gd bond

G Velkos et al. Chem Commun (Camb). .

Abstract

Magnetic properties of the azafullerene Gd2@C79N are studied by SQUID magnetometry. The effective exchange coupling constant jGd,e between the Gd spins and the spin of unpaired electron residing on the single-electron Gd-Gd bond is determined to be 170 ± 10 cm-1. Low temperature AC measurements revealed field-induced millisecond-long relaxation of magnetization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) Magnetization curves of Gd2@C79N measured at different temperatures. (b) Magnetization versus the quotient μ0HT–1. Dots are experimental points, solid lines are simulations using eqn (1) and the jeffGd,e value of 170 cm–1, the dash line in (b) is a simulation for the [Gd3+–e–Gd3+] system with non-interacting spins. The inset in (b) shows molecular structure and DFT-computed spin density distribution in Gd2@C79N (see footnote §) visualized with isovalues ±0.015 a.u. (solid) and ±0.0012 a.u. (semi-transparent). Three well-seen maxima of the spin density correspond to Gd atoms and unpaired electron spin (see also Fig. S3, ESI†).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (a) The product χ·T (χ is magnetic susceptibility) measured for Gd2@C79N in the field of 1 T (dots) and compared to the simulations with different values of the exchange coupling constant jeffGd,e (coloured lines; the values of jeffGd,e are given in cm–1). (b) Comparison of experimental χ·T curves measured in different magnetic fields from 0.5 to 7 T (dots) to the results of simulations with the jeffGd,e constant of 170 cm–1. The inset in (b) shows thermal populations of the giant-spin states, in particular S = 15/2 (black), 13/2 (red), and 11/2 (blue).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. AC magnetometry studies of Gd2@C79N. (a) Out-of-phase susceptibility χ′′ measured at 1.8 K in different constant DC fields. (b) Same as (a), but showing the out-of-phase signal susceptibility χ′′ versus in-phase susceptibility χ′ (Cole–Cole plots). (c) Relaxation times of magnetization as a function of the magnetic field. (d) Out-of-phase susceptibility χ′′ measured at different temperatures in the constant field of 0.3 T. (e) Same as (d), but showing the Cole–Cole plots. (f) Relaxation times of magnetization in the field of 0.3 T as a function of temperature; the lines are fits to the Orbach relaxation mechanism (red, Ueff = 6.5 K) or to the power law (blue, n = 3.2). The dots in (a,b,d and e) are experimental values, lines are the fits with generalized Debye model, the latter is also used to determine relaxation time from AC data.

References

    1. Sessoli R., Gatteschi D., Caneschi A., Novak M. A. Nature. 1993;365:141.
    2. Gatteschi D., Sessoli R., Cornia A. Chem. Commun. 2000:725.
    1. Demir S., Jeon I.-R., Long J. R., Harris T. D. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015;289–290:149.
    2. Gupta T., Rajeshkumar T., Rajaraman G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:14568. - PubMed
    1. Kanetomo T., Yoshitake T., Ishida T. Inorg. Chem. 2016;55:8140. - PubMed
    2. Kanetomo T., Kihara T., Miyake A., Matsuo A., Tokunaga M., Kindo K., Nojiri H., Ishida T. Inorg. Chem. 2017;56:3310. - PubMed
    1. Demir S., Zadrozny J. M., Nippe M., Long J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:18546. - PubMed
    2. Rinehart J. D., Fang M., Evans W. J., Long J. R. Nat. Chem. 2011;3:538. - PubMed
    3. Meihaus K. R., Corbey J. F., Fang M., Ziller J. W., Long J. R., Evans W. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014;53:3099. - PubMed
    1. Popov A. A., Yang S., Dunsch L. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:5989. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources