Coating and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Air Spray Coated Drug Coated Balloons
- PMID: 29497966
- PMCID: PMC5990435
- DOI: 10.1007/s13239-018-0346-1
Coating and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Air Spray Coated Drug Coated Balloons
Abstract
Drug coated balloons (DCB) are becoming the standard-care treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). DCB use excipients to transfer and retain anti-proliferative drugs, such as paclitaxel. Excipients thus play a vital role in the design and function of DCB, however methods to coat balloons with excipients and anti-proliferative drugs remain unknown. The goal of this study was to thus develop an approach to coat and evaluate DCB for various excipients. An air sprayer method was developed to deposit paclitaxel and various excipients onto non-coated commercially available angioplasty balloons. The coating of the angioplasty balloons was evaluated for drug deposition and coating efficiency using high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Drug transfer and retention of the coated angioplasty balloons into arterial segments were evaluated ex vivo using harvested pig arteries in a pulsatile flow bioreactor. The air sprayer method successfully delivered varying excipients including bovine serum albumin (BSA), urea and iohexol. The air spray method was configured to coat four angioplasty balloons simultaneously with paclitaxel and iohexol with an average paclitaxel load of 4.0 ± 0.70 µg/mm2. The intra-day (within) and inter-day (between) coating precisions, defined as relative standard deviation (RSD), was 17.2 and 15.5%, respectively. Ex vivo deployment of iohexol-paclitaxel DCB yielded an arterial paclitaxel concentration of 123.4 ± 44.68 ng/mg (n = 3) at 1 h, 126.7 ± 25.27 ng/mg (n = 3) at 1 day, and 12.9 ± 12.88 ng/mg (n = 3) at 7 days. This work provides proof-of-concept of a quick, inexpensive approach to coat commercially available angioplasty balloons with paclitaxel and various excipients.
Keywords: Coating; Drug coated balloon; Iohexol; Paclitaxel; Pharmacokinetics.
Figures
References
-
- Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, 3rd, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Pandey DK, Paynter NP, Reeves MJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB American Heart Association Statistics C, Stroke Statistics S. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:399–410. - PubMed
-
- Hirsch AT, Hartman L, Town RJ, Virnig BA. National health care costs of peripheral arterial disease in the Medicare population. Vascular Medicine. 2008;13:209–215. - PubMed
-
- Tepe G, Schnorr B, Albrecht T, Brechtel K, Claussen CD, Scheller B, Speck U, Zeller T. Angioplasty of Femoral-Popliteal Arteries With Drug-Coated Balloons: 5-Year Follow-Up of the THUNDER Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:102–108. - PubMed
-
- Schillinger M, Haumer M, Schlerka G, Mlekusch W, Exner M. Restenosis after Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Segment: The Role of Inflammation. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2001;8:477–483. - PubMed
-
- Maca T, Ahmadi R, Derfler K, Hörl W, Koppensteiner R, Minar E, Schneider B, Stümpflen A, Ehringer H. Elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased incidence of restenosis after femoropopliteal PTA: Rationale for the higher risk of recurrence in females? Atherosclerosis. 1996;127:27–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
