Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;25(3):671-692.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0037-1. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Science, Technology and Innovation as Social Goods for Development: Rethinking Research Capacity Building from Sen's Capabilities Approach

Affiliations

Science, Technology and Innovation as Social Goods for Development: Rethinking Research Capacity Building from Sen's Capabilities Approach

Maru Mormina. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Science and technology are key to economic and social development, yet the capacity for scientific innovation remains globally unequally distributed. Although a priority for development cooperation, building or developing research capacity is often reduced in practice to promoting knowledge transfers, for example through North-South partnerships. Research capacity building/development tends to focus on developing scientists' technical competencies through training, without parallel investments to develop and sustain the socioeconomic and political structures that facilitate knowledge creation. This, the paper argues, significantly contributes to the scientific divide between developed and developing countries more than any skills shortage. Using Charles Taylor's concept of irreducibly social goods, the paper extends Sen's Capabilities Approach beyond its traditional focus on individual entitlements to present a view of scientific knowledge as a social good and the capability to produce it as a social capability. Expanding this capability requires going beyond current fragmented approaches to research capacity building to holistically strengthen the different social, political and economic structures that make up a nation's innovation system. This has implications for the interpretation of human rights instruments beyond their current focus on access to knowledge and for focusing science policy and global research partnerships to design approaches to capacity building/development beyond individual training/skills building.

Keywords: Capabilities approach; Capacity building; Collective or social capabilities; Development; Low and middle income countries; North–South partnerships; Research systems; Science technology and innovation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abramovitz M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History. 1986;46(02):385–406.
    1. Ackoff RL. From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 1989;16(1):3–9.
    1. Agrawal A. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change. 1995;26(3):413–439.
    1. Alkire S. Using the capability approach: Prospective and evaluative analyses. In: Comim F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S, editors. The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 26–50.
    1. Archibugi D, Pietrobelli C. The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2003;70(9):861–883.

LinkOut - more resources