Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Mar;35(3):353-366.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0675-3. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Effectiveness of a Fixed-Dose, Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril and Amlodipine in Patients with Hypertension: A Non-Interventional Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effectiveness of a Fixed-Dose, Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril and Amlodipine in Patients with Hypertension: A Non-Interventional Study

Susanne V Fleig et al. Adv Ther. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter study to examine the effect of a fixed-dose combination of perindopril/amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension.

Methods: Patients who were previously untreated or required a change in medication were treated with a fixed combination of perindopril/amlodipine (3.5/2.5 or 7.0/5.0 mg) for 12 weeks. Changes in office, home and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) were recorded. Adherence was assessed by the Hill-Bone medication adherence scale.

Results: Overall, 1814 patients (mean age 60.0 ± 13.4 years) were included in 614 German practices, and data of 1770 patients were analyzed. At study entry, 97.7% of patients received perindopril/amlodipine at a daily dose of 3.5 mg/2.5 mg, and 47.9% of patients remained on this dose during the study period. Treatment with perindopril/amlodipine decreased mean office BP from 163.7/95.4 to 133.6/80.3 mmHg (p < 0.0001), resulting in a hypertension control rate of 69.1%. Blood pressure control was comparable in previously untreated and treated patients (70.3 vs. 68.1%), and in younger and older patients (70.6 < 65 vs. 66.3% ≥ 65 years). Ambulatory BP measurements were available in a subgroup of patients (n = 167), and mean 24 h ambulatory BP decreased from 150.6 ± 12.6/88.9 ± 8.8 to 132.4 ± 11.9/79.4 ± 8.5 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with severe hypertension European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) grade II or III decreased from 64.4 to 3.9%, and patients with pre-existing isolated systolic hypertension (n = 284) converted to normal BP in 67.6% of cases. Nearly half of the patients (47.2%) were perfectly adherent during the study. In previously treated patients, the percentage of patients with perfect adherence increased from 20.6% prior to study to 43.5% at final visit (p < 0.0001). Adverse drug reactions were documented for 4.9% of patients.

Conclusion: A fixed-dose combination of perindopril/amlodipine shows significant blood pressure reduction and improvement in medication adherence in a primary care setting.

Trial registration: ISRCTN26323538.

Funding: Servier Deutschland GmbH.

Keywords: Adherence; Amlodipine; Cardiology; Hypertension; Non-interventional study; Perindopril; Prospective; Single-pill combination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Antihypertensive treatment status at baseline. a Treatment status at baseline according to number of antihypertensive drugs (DC drug class) (n = 1814). b Prevalence of antihypertensive drug class (n = 980) at baseline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. a Total population, office vs. home measurements (n = 1770/1282, LOCF). b Systolic and diastolic office blood pressure and heart rate (HR) in the LOCF study population over time (n = 1770 for BP, n = 1680 for HR). c 24 h-ABPM measurements available in subset of patients (n = 187 for day, 175 for night, 167 for all measurements, LOCF). ***p < 0.0001 vs. V1 (baseline)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in blood pressure in patient subgroups. a Patients with previous antihypertensive treatment (n = 967, LOCF) versus treatment naïve patients (n = 803, LOCF). b Patients younger than 65 years (n = 1133, LOCF) vs. patients older than 65 years (n = 636, LOCF)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Treatment response, blood pressure classification according to ESH/ESC and tracking of patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). a Overall Responder rates (RR < 140/90 mmHg at last observation) in patients with hypertension grade 1–3 at baseline in the total population (n = 1744) as well as in the subgroups of patients with previous antihypertensive medication (n = 947), without previous antihypertensive treatment (n = 797), patients younger than 65 years (n = 1120) and patients age 65 years and older (n = 623). b Classification of blood pressure according to the ESH/ESC-guidelines at admission and at the last observation: while initially 72.4% of patients had hypertension grade 2 or worse, this fraction is reduced to 5.2% at the last observation. c Reanalysis to track patients with ISH. Patients with ISH at baseline show good blood pressure control in > 67% at the last observation (n = 284). d Patients with ISH at the last observation showed mainly systolic/diastolic hypertension (SDH) at baseline (n = 323)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Treatment adherence before and after switching to perindopril/amlodipine. Change in adherence rate to antihypertensive treatment in patients with previous antihypertensive treatment (n = 897) after switching to perindopril/amlodipine as well as in patients with newly treated hypertension. Perfect adherence rate is defined as percentage of patients who answer all items of the Hill-Bone Medications Adherence Scale with “none of the time”

References

    1. Neuhauser H, Thamm M, Ellert U. Blood pressure in Germany 2008–2011: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundh Gesundh. 2013;56(5–6):795–801. doi: 10.1007/s00103-013-1669-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mancia G, Fagard R. ESH/ESC guidelines for themanagement of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–1357. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarganas G, et al. Trends in antihypertensive medicatrion use and blood pressure control among adults with hypertension in Germany. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29(1):104–113. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Claxton A, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the association between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1296–1310. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80109-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta A, Arshad S, Poulter NR. Compliance, safety, and effectiveness of fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents. Hypertension. 2010;55:399–407. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.139816. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources