Inhalational versus Intravenous Induction of Anesthesia in Children with a High Risk of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 29498948
- DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002152
Inhalational versus Intravenous Induction of Anesthesia in Children with a High Risk of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Erratum in
-
Inhalational versus Intravenous Induction of Anesthesia in Children with a High Risk of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Erratum.Anesthesiology. 2018 Jun;128(6):1266. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002218. Anesthesiology. 2018. PMID: 29578862 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence suggests that children have a lower incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events when intravenous propofol is used compared with inhalational sevoflurane for the anesthesia induction. Limiting these events can improve recovery time as well as decreasing surgery waitlists and healthcare costs. This single center open-label randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of the anesthesia induction technique on the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in children at high risk of those events.
Methods: Children (N = 300; 0 to 8 yr) with at least two clinically relevant risk factors for perioperative respiratory adverse events and deemed suitable for either technique of anesthesia induction were recruited and randomized to either intravenous propofol or inhalational sevoflurane. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events between children receiving intravenous induction and those receiving inhalation induction of anesthesia.
Results: Children receiving intravenous propofol were significantly less likely to experience perioperative respiratory adverse events compared with those who received inhalational sevoflurane after adjusting for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and weight (perioperative respiratory adverse event: 39/149 [26%] vs. 64/149 [43%], relative risk [RR]: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.3, P = 0.002, respiratory adverse events at induction: 16/149 [11%] vs. 47/149 [32%], RR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.8 to 5. 2, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Where clinically appropriate, anesthesiologists should consider using an intravenous propofol induction technique in children who are at high risk of experiencing perioperative respiratory adverse events.
Visual abstract: An online visual overview is available for this article at http://links.lww.com/ALN/B725.
Comment in
-
Induction of Anesthesia for Children: Should We Recommend the Needle or the Mask?Anesthesiology. 2018 Jun;128(6):1051-1052. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002207. Anesthesiology. 2018. PMID: 29620571 No abstract available.
-
Ramgolam A, Hall GL, Zhang G, Hegarty M, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Inhalational versus IV induction of anesthesia in children with a high risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(6):1065-1074.AORN J. 2018 Nov;108(5):566-571. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12390. AORN J. 2018. PMID: 30376178 No abstract available.
-
Other Factors Affect the Occurrence of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events.Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):507-508. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002574. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 30762637 No abstract available.
-
Improving External Validity May Jeopardize Internal Validity.Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):508-509. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002575. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 30762638 No abstract available.
-
Is a Single Dose of Propofol Good Enough to Prevent Respiratory Complications beyond the Induction Phase?Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):509-510. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002576. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 30762639 No abstract available.
-
Does Intravenous versus Inhalational Induction of Anesthesia Only Decrease Perioperative Respiratory Events during the Induction Period?Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):510. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002573. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 30762640 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):511. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002578. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 30762641 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):511-513. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002577. Anesthesiology. 2019. PMID: 30762642 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical